Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviours. Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In the world of today, some people reckon that other countries tourists follow their nation's local traditions and ethics. While, other group of thinkers believes that countries to be visited should accept tradition inequality. Both have their own pros and cons. Before commenting my opinion I will discuss in the following paragraph.
To embark on, there are several reasons for this phenomenon. First and foremost, it is significant for the visitor to readily communicate with local culture. For a classic example, other countries visitor comes in India, and they familiar with the Hindi language as a result, they can not face any trouble situation during the visiting country. In addition, when tourists stalk host countries customs, they get the freedom to go in-depth of tradition so that, they gain more knowledge about the visiting countries. If tourist might not follow, they will not enjoy very well in visiting countries.
On the other hand, there are many benefits of imposed foreign culture. To begin with, people should be introduced a new style of foreign people's such as, hairstyle, dressing style and many more. To illustrate, Indian traditions like dress and sadi are most popular for this reason, many countries applied this in their tradition. Moreover, visiting countries know more about another countries rituals as well as a custom. It is significant for developing countries to enhance their ability and establish innovative relations with another nations. What is more, visiting country find weakness in their custom and replace with foreigner custom consequently, the custom of host countries became more strengthful.
To conclude, I strongly agree that it is important for every country that its tradition and custom should be preserved therefore, every county should appreciate other country's language, tradition and should welcome them.
- In the future it seems it will be more difficult to live on the earth Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries 84
- Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve while others think that the government cannot solve these environmental problems unless individuals make some action Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The table below provides statistics on several major metro systems around the comparisons where relevant
- The charts below give information about world spending and population Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ir nations local traditions and ethics. While, other group of thinkers believes that ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Before” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ity. Both have their own pros and cons. Before commenting my opinion I will discuss in...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...l culture. For a classic example, other countries visitor comes in India, and they famili...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43986254296 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64234578314 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584192439863 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4069661826 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9375 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322358308759 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103610872249 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722325446821 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217673340035 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845451863736 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.