Some people claim that government should take action to ensure that people have a healthy lifestyle. Others, however, disagree and believe people should decide themselves which way they want to live their life
Since tons of rules have come to an act, people's lifestyle has been bounded by these rules to a great extend. It has been a burning issue that whether lifestyle of people ought to be supervised by government or they himself should let free to decide their fate. Here, i would like to discuss both views with my opinion
It is argued that lifestyle of people should be in government's hand. Lifestyle without supervision can lead to several problems as people will have independence to do things according to their desires, whether good or bad, they will perform all illegal activities freely, this situation can lead to lots of crime. Furthermore, government has power to regulate people's lifestyle in better way by bringing some laws in practice. Hence, government should step forward and take care of lifestyle of people for the betterment of their country.
Other's have conflicting views, according to them, this is era of democracy where people are liable for taking their decision on their own for their bright tomorrow. They believe that, people are educated enough and they know what is better for them. therefore, they should set free to live their lives accordingly as it can be complicated for government to regulate every single one's lifestyle in big populated countries.
In my notion, everyone should be allocated with rights that they could supervise their lifestyle according to their desires to a certain extend. But, government should also associate in order to eliminate those illegal activities which are taking place on name of lifestyle. To be specific, usage of drugs have been mammoth over the past few years on name of lifestyle. however, such trend ought to be outlawed by government
To recapitulate, there should be a mutual level in determining lifestyle of people. All the legal activities should be taken care by people and government should involve when lifestyle leads to commit any crime
- Cycling has many benefits yet in some countries there is a decrease in the number of people using bicycles as their main form of transportation Why is it happening Give suggestions how to encourage people to use bicycles again 75
- Some people believe that it is impossible to help everyone in need around the world. That is why governments should only focus on helping people of their own country. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and 67
- Nowadays most people wear western clothing rather than their traditional clothes. What are the reasons for it? Is it a positive or a negative development? 67
- The graphs below show the number of visitors to two cities in a given year. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant 61
- many countries spend too much money on training of a few individuals for international sports competition Some people believe that government should spend more in ordinary people instead Do you agree r disagree give your opinion and example 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...d let free to decide their fate. Here, i would like to discuss both views with m...
^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
... and they know what is better for them. therefore, they should set free to live their liv...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 138, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
...according to their desires to a certain extend. But, government should also associate ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 370, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...he past few years on name of lifestyle. however, such trend ought to be outlawed by gov...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'also', 'but', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'therefore']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.230547550432 0.247107183377 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.195965417867 0.155533422707 126% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0749279538905 0.0946595960268 79% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0259365994236 0.0501214627716 52% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0662824207493 0.0437548338989 151% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.129682997118 0.122226691241 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0634005763689 0.0403226058552 157% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.6610389174 2.80594681477 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0576368876081 0.0326793684256 176% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0489913544669 0.0861772015684 57% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0518731988473 0.021408717616 242% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0115273775216 0.011925033212 97% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1920.0 1933.35771543 99% => OK
No of words: 318.0 316.048096192 101% => OK
Chars per words: 6.03773584906 6.12580529183 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20517956788 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.37106918239 0.374742101984 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.264150943396 0.28420135186 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.185534591195 0.203846283523 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.150943396226 0.137316102897 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6610389174 2.80594681477 95% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.037074148 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547169811321 0.56093040696 98% => OK
Word variations: 57.893693771 60.7387585426 95% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0891783567 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.7142857143 20.7743622355 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3759597367 49.517814964 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.142857143 127.492653851 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7743622355 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.642857142857 0.814263465372 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.99599198397 100% => OK
Readability: 49.1293800539 49.1944974215 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.47 1.69124875643 87% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425459442965 0.332605444948 128% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.124523705095 0.102741220458 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0581702007657 0.0668466124924 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.564868200127 0.534860350844 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.123359520864 0.148594505496 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182960632947 0.134430193775 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594615008191 0.0742795772207 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.351896177382 0.324371583561 108% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0351968906807 0.0638462369009 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282529480175 0.228012699653 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287076526748 0.058150111329 49% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.68436873747 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 5.90881763527 169% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.4468937876 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.