Some people store personal and private information online, including banking, contacts and addresses. Is it a positive or negative trend?
In this digital era, it is increasingly prevalent that people tend to save personal and confidential details online. There is a divergence of opinions about this tendency, whether it is good to do so. This essay will throw some light on both Notions of the concept and give my viewpoint.
To commence, there are some reasons for people to digitally store private information. The most basic one comes to its convenience. Nowadays, people spend a considerable amount of time on travel, especially businessmen and commuters. As a result, saving banking details, contacts, and addresses on cloud storage would benefit them a lot. They can instantly access these kinds of information and anytime and anywhere with an internet-connected device. Besides, a person with a golden fish brain might consider keeping personal details online the best way to always get important information.
In spite of these benefits, I side with those who criticise this trend. The first robust reason comes from the fragile security of the internet. With the advancement in technology, modern hackers can easily infringe on our private accounts and steal information for illegal purposes. For example, these high-tech criminals can use our banking details to withdraw all money. Our life is considerably in threat if confidential information like this is leaked.
Besides, this tendency could form a bad habit of dependence on technology. With the inclination of using smart devices and cloud storage to keep personal details, individuals might forget the importance of remembering them. Hence, in some cases without accessibility is to the internet-connected smartphones, tablets, or laptops, people then find it hard to recall the memory to get these kinds of information.
By and large, even there are some advantages of storing personal and private details online, I am an advocate of the opposite side. I reckon that we should keep important information in our mind in cases of some unexpected situations. If people do not have a good memory, they must consider security methods to keep them private as much as possible
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-12 | nbaochi14 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-29 | buiminhduc | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-02 | TiaraNGuyen@99 | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-02 | immtee | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-17 | Le Bich Diep | 78 | view |
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road might cause some problems What are the problems What could be done to solve those problems 84
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road might cause some problems What are the problems What could be done to solve those problems 73
- The bar chart below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over of three countries in 1980 and 2000 and prediction in 2030 67
- In many countries imprisonment is the most common solution to crimes However some people believe that better education will be a more effective solution To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that schools should choose students according to their academic abilities while others think it is better to have students of different abilities studying together Discuss both views and state your own opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, hence, if, so, then, for example, i reckon, as a result, by and large, in some cases, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26488095238 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03033925409 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58630952381 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9691648311 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.45 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.65 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235034766259 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620972253273 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539762861079 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125517198317 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064228133409 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.