Some people think the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel.
To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, Science and technology are developing increasingly, as a result the industries, and vehicles equipped with internal combustion engines are being upgraded and this increases the natural problems created by the pollutants of burning of fuels in these machines accordingly. It is thought that if the price of fuel is raised, the issue can be easily dealt with. As far as I am concerned, the solution is not to change the cost of fuel.
First and foremost, the problem cannot be solved globally by this way. What I mean by this is that costly fuel cannot affect the number of utilization of cars significantly in the world if existence of rich countries is taken into account. Moreover, studies show that the rate of carbon dioxide released into atmosphere by these countries is more than others. Arabian countries can be taken as an example. They are known as the users of the most pricy automobiles, and the restriction related to money cannot be created by increasing the cost of fuel. Hence, raising the price of fuel will not decrease the usage of cars in some countries and these problems will continue.
Secondly, machines working by fuel are not only things which damage environment. In other words, there are a number of substances people utilize daily and they do not even lag behind the automobiles which are not eco-friendly. For example, as a result of food, drink consumption, their pockets consisted of organic chemical compounds are disposed of into nature. Thereby, a lot of creatures swallow them unconsciously and die. Therefore, there exist natural problems which are caused by pollutants of fuel.
On the other hand, it should also be accepted that expensive fuel can be solution in the case that people, who realize that they are spending amounts of money to gasoline to drive their cars, will be trying to find new types of vehicles which function without petrol, and if they can do this, these machines may turn into new trend around the world, as a result rich countries will start to be interested in them. For example, when people choose electrical cars, pollutants of fuel will not be released into nature. However, according to some scientific articles, machines supplied with electrical motors have impact on nature negatively because of their energy supply batteries. Thus, this view asserts that the problem is not solved by the price.
To sum up, I think that these issues cannot be easily prevented by raising the cost of petrol. One reason is that the people who live in rich countries can purchase the gasoline and use the cars and this will not turn into problem for them. In addition, if we take into account that chemical substances used by people have negative effect for environment, it will be obvious that the solution is not related to only fuel. Finally, the other way of creating new type of engine which is more eco-friendly is ,recently, inaccessible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-11 | Toghrul Azizli | 67 | view |
- More and more wild animals are on the verge of extinction and others are on the endangered list What are the reasons for this What can be done to solve this problem 78
- In some cultures children are told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 78
- Shopping is now one of the most popular forms of leisure activity in many countries for young adults. What do you think is the reason for this? Is this a positive or negative development? 78
- The diagram shows how chewing gum is made 82
- Some people think the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel.To what extend do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...asingly, as a result the industries, and vehicles equipped with internal combust...
^^
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s a result the industries, and vehicles equipped with internal combustion engine...
^^
Line 3, column 586, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f fuel. Hence, raising the price of fuel will not decrease the usage of cars in s...
^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ople, who realize that they are spending amounts of money to gasoline to drive th...
^^
Line 7, column 583, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e scientific articles, machines supplied with electrical motors have impact on na...
^^
Line 7, column 657, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ct on nature negatively because of their energy supply batteries. Thus, this view...
^^
Line 9, column 503, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ype of engine which is more eco-friendly is ,recently, inaccessible.
^^
Line 9, column 507, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...of engine which is more eco-friendly is ,recently, inaccessible.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, i mean, i think, in addition, as a result, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 13.1623246493 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2429.0 1615.20841683 150% => OK
No of words: 491.0 315.596192385 156% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94704684318 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66380163634 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476578411405 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 760.5 506.74238477 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.289211218 49.4020404114 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.409090909 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3181818182 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186769011072 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624400493594 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437226305437 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112790015147 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293313393057 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.