Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, while others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In today’s world, promoting cultural activities can be beneficial for people and culture. There are some people who believe that governments do not have to pay money to support art and culture. In this following essay, I will discuss both views and give my own opinion.
On the one hand, there are a lot of people who want to oppose funding for art and culture. There are more issues to be addressed, for example, the deterioration of transport infrastructure which is the main reason for traffic accidents. As the bus is very old and must be renovated, the government can invest in it or in the road. In addition, some nearby countries should provide assistance in resolving the problem. Especially the environment. For instance, a large amount of garbage needs to be cleaned to avoid environmental pollution. They have to pay for a large number of people to do it.
On the other hand, cultural activities play a significant role in people's lives. Special events, like the Tet holiday or Christmas, are holidays when people gather together which can help increase solidarity in the family. Additionally, funding for cultural diversity preservation activities is needed. There are many museums that are quite degraded today, and they are having difficulty in attracting tourists. The government has constructed museums for ethnic minorities, whose populations are decreasing at an alarming rate.
In conclusion, I believe that cultural activities bring substantial attention and financial support to governments. However, they have to address issues in transportation and protect citizens' lives from the environment.
- Plastic bags plastic bottles and plastic packaging are bad for the environment What damage does plastic do to the environment What can be done by government and individuals to solve this problem 56
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life Why is it the case Can you suggest some ways to prepare people to work in the future 56
- Some people think that robots are very important to human s future development Others think that they are dangerous and have negative effects on society Discuss both opinions and give your personal view 80
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life Why is it the case Can you suggest some ways to prepare people to work in the future 61
- More and more people want to buy clothes car and other products from well known brands What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 562, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...nmental pollution. They have to pay for a large number of people to do it. On the other hand...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36575875486 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06269927931 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5953307393 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.58190069 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.1176470588 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1176470588 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23529411765 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393166035861 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109556795157 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818303116529 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224742115972 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0986339749573 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.27 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.