Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view ?
Whether the national budget should be poured into the arts or other realms sparks a controversy. Although I argue that investing in the arts does not mean dissipating money, I also suppose that it is essential for the government to allocate subsidies for other more urgent domains.
There are several reasons why state funding for the arts is not money squandering. To begin with, it is evident that the magnitude of art in a country is undeniable as it is deemed to represent the nation's culture and image as well. For example, the pyramid, an unique art architecture, has created a distinct identity of Egypt. Besides, investment in art can create career opportunities for artists and art teachers, which could assist them to land a living-wage job in order to cover their basic needs. By contrast, in the absence of the art industry, thousands of people can have to face unemployment.
However, it seems to me that other sectors are of more importance. First of all, it is advisable for the government to spend money on the educational system because education plays an important role in a country's sustainable development. For instance, in Germany, a good educational system has created thousands of highly-skilled workforce especially in the technological field, followed by becoming one of top ten countries in technology. In addition, another field in need of financial support is healthcare. As recently, the rapid spread of the covid 19 and the increasing incidence of the disease have posed a threat to the public health system.
In conclusion, while I subscribe to the opinion that the benefits of art should not be underestimated, it is my contention that other fields should take precedence over the arts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-18 | thiên định | 78 | view |
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva 73
- Task 2 Some people think that the incresig use of computers and mobile phones in communication has had negative effects on young people s reading and writing skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Task 1 The picture below shows the use of renewable energy accounting the total energy from 1971 to 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 51
- Task2 5 3 2020 some people argue that job satisfaction is more important than job security while other believe that they cannot always expecct kob satisfaction and a permanent job is more important Discuss both these views and givr your oppinion 61
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each category from five organisations 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...mage as well. For example, the pyramid, an unique art architecture, has created a ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07719298246 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03885578894 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1102358067 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.307692308 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132523273251 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454082022495 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352819582363 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0774168202752 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386728819014 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.