Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to have a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is an argument over whether or not those who keep doing the same job for a long time are more satisfied with their work life than those job-hobbing frequently. For me, I strongly believe that job fulfillment is not dependent on doing either few or many jobs, but on one’s decision about his/her career path.
On the one hand, there are obviously a lot of advantages of doing the same job in the same place for long. Firstly, the familiarity with the workplace and colleagues gives people a great sense of security and comfort. This is particularly right for ones that have no career ambitions and prefer to have a steady job, by which they can earn a living and support their family. Secondly, it takes time for the personality and competence of an employee to come to the knowledge of the senior managers, which brings him/her promotion opportunities if he/she desires to move up the career ladder. Thirdly, employers always value loyal people who devote the whole life to the development and prosperity of the company and are usually willing to offer a generous retirement package.
On the other hand, changing jobs often does bring people certain benefits. Admittedly, frequent job-hopping due to lack of expertise or social skills is not a sign of a good career path. In this situation, people should take a career break and reflect upon everything and address the problems if they wish to pursue a successful career. Whereas, for those that are keen on going on adventures in their career life, taking on different jobs in differents stages of life provides golden opportunities to acquire knowledge and experiences. Undeniably, working for many corporations in various fields and meeting many types of people helps broaden one’s horizons and provides him/her with a broader perspective. Moreover, in case of companies making cutbacks or going bankrupt, people who have changed jobs several times are the ones that are least worried about being made redundant since they are familiar with changing working environments and are never over-reliant on any single company to make money.
In conclusion, I would contend that whether people are content with their career or not is not necessarily subject to the number of jobs that they do. Instead, it is actually a matter of choice of each person.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-14 | huyen nguyen ngoc | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-31 | PHẠM THẢO | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-16 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-05 | Blackcytrus | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-29 | Blackcytrus | 78 | view |
- In many countries, governments are spending a large amount of money on improving Internet access. Why is it important and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money? 89
- New technologies have change the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Cycling is more environmentally-friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? How can its popularity be increased? 89
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
There is an argument over whether or not those who keep doing the same job for a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...areer. Whereas, for those that are keen on going on adventures in their career life, tak...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, whereas, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1940.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02590673575 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72008388568 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559585492228 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.8575608184 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.333333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7333333333 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296974021849 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954288479994 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639864225276 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189117727754 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555951418729 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.