Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities study together. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people hold a view that mixed ability classes have some benefits which are highly appreciable, while others think that education system is more well effective. This essay will discuss both views and give my opinion.
On the one hand, mixed level classes can bring about certain benefits. The first reason is that it create conditions which motivate all pupils to make sustained progress in learning within a common curriculum framework. It is obvious that when children have chances to learn with better ones, they will have more motivation to study harder to keep up with upper-track students. Moreover, when low-ability students and high-ability ones are integrated into the same class, it encourages teachers to find a proper teaching method that suits students of different levels of intelligence. This helps teachers to enhance their teaching performance since they have to deliver the lesson in an effective way to maximizes student's understanding.
On the other hand, I believe that streaming students generates more benefits to teachers and students. As to teachers, it is more convenient to tailor lessons in adequation with the ability level of the students. Tracking education system meets the need for highly gifted students to be with their intellectual peers to receive lessons targeted at their ability and proceed at their own speed. Another reason is that tracking classes helps weaker students feel equal and less pressured. It is due to the fact that studying with outstanding students make them feel inferior to their peers and lose confidence in themselves as they have to absorb knowledge beyond their capability.
In conclusion, although heterogeneous classes are beneficial for students to some extent, I belive that streaming classes facilitate the more specific teaching and learning process.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-30 | Heng Sophat | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | Meet2607 | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | tahmeed1993 | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | smokey | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-07 | kuldeep sharma | 100 | view |
- International travel can make people prejudiced rather than broad minded. Why people fail to benefit when they travel? What we can do to improve their understanding of the countries they visit? 89
- In many parts of the world, children and teenagers are committing more crimes. Why is this happening? How should they be punished? 78
- International travel can make people prejudiced rather than broad minded Why people fail to benefit when they travel What we can do to improve their understanding of the countries they visit 88
- There are many types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is a traditional music of a country more important than international music? 61
- A government has a responsibility to its citizens to ensure their safety Therefore some people think that government should increase spending on defense but spend less on social benefits To what extent you agree 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 682, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e since they have to deliver the lesson in an effective way to maximizes students understanding. O...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 174, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...the more specific teaching and learning process.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, well, while, as to, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4020979021 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76115097679 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56993006993 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6054825736 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.846153846 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318772839744 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105750343656 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633316601969 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185641033171 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811655429871 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.