Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus, do you think that this is a postive or negative development?
Thanks to some technological development with online services, these days there are different online lessons provided by several universities. I believe that this new teaching method in colleges is beneficial due to some reasons.
Some people tend to believe that taking the online courses in the universities can cause a couple of drawbacks. First of all, as students can access other online programmes such as online gaming or other websites while taking online lessons, the level of their concentration on the study would be significantly lower than those who take the classes on campus. Also, taking online classes might give rise to health problems for pupils, such as dried eyes, the lack of sleep, VDT syndrome, and ADHD.
However, the vitalisation of utilising online courses in the universities has led to remarkable merits with educational dynamism. Without the limitation of time and space, students are allowed to take the lessons they chose whenever they want. Thus, they are less likely to be pressured on participate in courses on time. Besides, this academic practice is of the great help to students who are disabled or are less sociable. It is because online students are not required to interact with other peers or group projects. In some statistics, many users who have these kinds of personal issues are inclined to be very satisfied with cyber-educational programmes in colleges.
In conclusion, some positive influences of using online classes created by universities outweigh its negative aspects because of the efficiency of online courses and students' a good satisfaction with it.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-08-23 | marykim7178 | 61 | view |
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not to go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. Summarise the information. 89
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restuarnts between 2003 and 2013. 78
- The group below shows average carbon dioxide(CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 84
- The tables below give information about sales of fairtrade-labelled coffee and banana in 1999 and 2004 in five european countries. 67
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, so, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32421875 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89692883159 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58984375 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4185705535 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.583333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235835795538 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855802472174 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590411081981 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154177733281 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397031680285 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.