Students in university should specialize in one subject rather than develop a wider range of many different subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is argued in these days that profession in a field may support graduates in prompting personal growth, however some opponents contend that graduates should be acquired a variety of knowledge towards comprehensive development for young generation. I am concerned that I agree that spreading different areas might bring positive impact for individuals and society.
In my point, it is commonly believed that knowledge of wide range of subjects that students gained in campus environment is beneficial in daily lives. Initially, apart from studying some academic subjects such as math or physic, they can have more time that spent on arts or music that graduates not only study but have relaxation thought these subjects. It is of importance that some talented have opportunities in promoting their potential, these individuals are more likely to obtain more reputation from art or music compared with studying academic areas. Secondly, practical know-how is dispensable part in some case. For instance, graduates those are taught of culture or history background of some countries may facilitate in having journeys or tours on oversea countries. Specific it is unusual that waiters in Japanese will have feelings of disrespectful if anyone leave the tip on the table. Students can avoid to perform such actions if they are imparted this knowledge.
With tendency in changing economy, modern workforce is required to be more understanding of many fields in meeting demand of recruiters. In the competitive workforce market, those who ensure to fulfill with distinct tasks may are placed more emphasis of employers. There is a clear examples that exceling in math is inadequate in order to becoming a successful accountant, graduates need to study more of computer skills or ability of language that is crucial elements in deciding recruitment in some companies. As a result, teaching with various fields will be effective ways to graduates gaining success in lives as well as occupation in years ahead.
In conclusion, It seems to me that in altering demanding of society, students should be imparted a wide range of subjects to benefit for careers and some circumstances in their practical lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-05 | maikhanh29194 | 84 | view |
| 2018-06-21 | Duuuuuuuuuu | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that country development reaps benefits from the high-educated university students. However, some people think that the large amount of young people in university only leads to high unemployment graduates. Discuss both views 84
- The given maps illustate data about layout of the civic centre recently and proposal for new one. Overall, there are some disparities significantly in project compared to one currently. \ . 78
- In some countries old people are highly valued while in some cultures young people are highly valued Discuss both views and give your opinion 79
- The news media have become too much influence in people lives todayand this is a negative development? To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 874, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'leaves'.
Suggestion: leaves
...ave feelings of disrespectful if anyone leave the tip on the table. Students can avoi...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 915, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid performing'.
Suggestion: avoid performing
...eave the tip on the table. Students can avoid to perform such actions if they are imparted this ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31232091691 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92297037248 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575931232092 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6641415129 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.428571429 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9285714286 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111863312207 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384834672192 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327559645507 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0712003850408 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0196131286723 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.