• Task 2: Some employers are giving increased importance to employing people with good social skills in addition to good qualifications. Do you agree or disagree that social skills are as important as good qualifications for success in a job?
Nowadays, employers are more likely to recruit people with good social skills as well as good qualifications. In my opinion, it is reasonable that social skills play the same important role as good qualifications.
It is undeniable that good qualifications are accompanied with some benefits for employers. To begin with, employees with good qualifications are recognised by renowned universities or colleges so that they can have in-depth knowledge, skills about a particular field. Hence, they have the ability of solving persistent problems that require academic understanding and contribute to renovations for companies in the long run. In addition, products which are invented by scientists, engineers and so on with good certificates are more easily to get reputations from customers, business partners. For example, advertisements are more convincing when products are told to be created by experts with a variety of degrees and then that makes profits for employers.
However, social skills are also crucial in employment because they are beneficial for future works. First, people with good social skills find it easier to learn and improve in workplaces that include a lot of people. Thanks to great social skills, they are inclined to confer with others and adopt precious knowledge so they can disclose their inner potential and devote themselves to companies. Second, social skills also help people bring good results in teamwork, which usually happens in real life because they can find good ways to show their own attitudes and listen to others in order to get the best decision. Therefore, they also contribute to create a joyful, comfortable environment in workplaces and enhance images of companies.
In conclusion, social skills are as necessary as good qualifications in employing people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | hien3112 | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | wwwdung | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-18 | hoaithuongnguyen | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Luisjackiet | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Luisjackiet | 73 | view |
- Task 1 The diagram below shows the process of making olive oil Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Task 1 The two bar charts below show the proportion of 14 16 year old students studying a foreign language in an English speaking country and the top three foreign languages Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 78
- Task 1 The chart below shows the percentage of a drug company s total sales by region from 2002 to 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- Task 1 The graph below shows the proportion of types of magazines sold by the company in 1975 1995 and 2015
- Task 1 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46975088968 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03523463386 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555160142349 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9296719023 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.230769231 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8461538462 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429026535008 0.244688304435 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178837883954 0.084324248473 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130988198268 0.0667982634062 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.323841412291 0.151304729494 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101340691836 0.056905535591 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.