Some employers are giving increased importance to employing people with good social skills in addition to good qualifications. Do you agree or disagree that social skills are as important as good qualifications for success in a job?
These days, it is increasingly important for employers to hire individuals who possess both qualifications and adequate interpersonal abilities. While I acknowledge the value of social skills in specific job domains, I maintain the view that for the majority of professions, qualifications that demonstrate professional expertise hold greater significance as a factor in achieving professional success.
At first glance perspective for the matter, many a person who thinks that an employee should have excellent social skills to get the achievement in his/her career may have several arguments. At first, communication ability can be beneficial for those who work in a dynamic environment and have to interact with other colleagues. They should create various conversations to discuss the ideas, build the working plans, and share the difficulties during operating the work, thereby, improving the work efficiency. Another argument is that a social skill with impressive presentation ability contributes significantly to the job which requires the workers to communicate directly with their customers. To be specific, the staffs have to convince the customers to use their products and services, and the social person tends to be easy to get attraction and satisfaction from others.
Nevertheless, I firmly hold a belief that professional qualification is involved a crucial role in success of the companies for several reasons. First and foremost, for a working position without communication with others, social skills are not necessary. By way of illustration, scientists working in the laboratory to create an invention for a better life, their knowledge and research abilities are much more important than any social skills. This also explains why education and academic degrees still hold primary standards for job requirements, especially human-related jobs nowadays. Another reason is that hiring employees with high qualifications and good social skills requires much time and resources for recruitment. In fact, in order to employ talent with not only high qualifications but also good social skills which may not be important for the job, companies need a long time to find candidates who adapt to all requirements and have to pay a lot of money for their salary. Therefore, the company owner should balance social skills and knowledgeable qualifications with job requirements to have suitable recruitment.
To sum up, although social skills are very important to get achievements in a long-term career nowadays, however, I still hold believe that qualifications in professional expertise are a core value and have a significant impact on the success of companies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | hien3112 | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | wwwdung | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-18 | hoaithuongnguyen | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Luisjackiet | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Luisjackiet | 73 | view |
- In the modern world many employees lack soft skills such as communication and working in teams What are the main causes of this problem What are the effects of the lack of such skills Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from you 73
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems 78
- Nowadays it is common for people to get married and have children in their thirties rather than when they are younger Do you agree or disagree that this trend will benefit society 56
- There are an increasing number of people who do not know their neighbours What causes this situation How to solve it 67
- In some countries criminal trials are shown on television for public Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, while, in fact, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2278.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59705159705 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29391214641 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538083538084 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 706.5 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.4014367594 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.866666667 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1333333333 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363927037575 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13160376461 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847009086251 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224613306257 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102042693255 0.056905535591 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.