Some employers are giving increased importance to employing people with good social skills in addition to good qualifications. Do you agree or disagree that social skills are as important as good qualifications for success in a job?
In today’s society, it is increasingly common for many employers to recruit employees with high proficiency in social skills besides proficient qualifications. From my perspective, I strongly agree that possessing good soft skills apart from formal qualifications can give people opportunities to succeed in their careers.
Undeniably, excellent qualifications in a specific field play a vital role in the success of an occupation. In fact, recruiters who are able at their specialized capabilities and knowledge will assist companies to thrive and reach their career edge. This is probably true for the works involving intensive research such as medicine, computer science, and information technology. Without in-depth knowledge and technical skills, employees cannot conduct research and come up with effective working proposals; hence, they will stand a limited chance of being recruited and getting a promotion.
Nonetheless, having good social skills can help people to guarantee the success of their profession. Admittedly, stellar credentials are indispensable for a career in terms of a professional major but it is not enough for advancing occupation success. Nowadays, workers rarely work individually and they often cooperate with others to get professional achievement. For this reason, persons have a tendency to reinforce their intrapersonal skills with a view to building good relationships with their colleagues and business partners. In contrast, employees who lack such important skills are susceptible to isolation and conflicts among workers on the ground of misunderstanding and miscommunication. Additionally, it is excellent social skills that also help people to stand a chance of climbing their career ladder. For instance, should recruiters be competent in communication and compromising skills, they will convince the investors to sign contracts and attract an enormous investment for companies.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the combination of good qualifications and excellent social skills have a strong correlation in determining a successful job as it not only helps people to integrate with their working counterparts but it also facilitates their working process.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | hien3112 | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | wwwdung | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-18 | hoaithuongnguyen | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Luisjackiet | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Luisjackiet | 73 | view |
- The graph below gives information about the price of bananas in four countries between 1994 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- Causes and effects of job loss 84
- The chart below shows the water levels in reservoirs of 6 cities in Australia in October 2009 and 2010 78
- The line graph reveals information on Wool Price in New Zealand over a period of 20 years from 1980 to 2000
- Some employers are giving increased importance to employing people with good social skills in addition to good qualifications Do you agree or disagree that social skills are as important as good qualifications for success in a job 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, nonetheless, so, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82407407407 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39023647002 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0180199842 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.785714286 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324318541302 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105756947404 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843121101068 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207078415758 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.097679462039 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.