Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people argue that video recordings are a better way to learn about other people's lives than reading written documents. This is because videos are more effective. Although I admit video recording is much more beneficial than documents, personally, I mostly disagree with this statement.
On the one hand, video records bring benefits. By using video records, people can update their knowledge and visualize how inhabitants live in different countries. In addition, watching video recordings does not cost much because they are posted on social networking sites. However, you must buy handwritten documents to use for research purposes. Furthermore, by watching videos people experience other countries' customs and life instead of imagining them through written documents. The video illustrates poverty and food shortages, for example, due to lack of clean water and food.
On the other hand, video learning is not the optimal medium for everyone. For instance, in ethnic minority areas they cannot afford technological equipment to view video records, so handwritten documents are still the optimal tool for everyone. On top of that, many documents are recorded only in text form, especially about details from the past due to lack of technology. This means it is difficult to access information about influential individuals and events through videos.
In conclusion, video records and written documents are both valid. Many documents are recorded only in text form, especially about details from the past due to lack of technology. This makes it difficult for people to access information about significant individuals and events through video only.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-20 | kevann | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-20 | kevann | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-21 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | dominhthanh | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-03 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 84
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road cause some problems What are the problems What are the solutions 56
- The table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r way to learn about other peoples lives than reading written documents. This is ...
^^
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l individuals and events through videos. In conclusion, video records and written...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, still, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5137254902 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79335730969 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556862745098 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2413151695 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328900706852 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115122801832 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105640043956 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216147067777 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0901767181289 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r way to learn about other peoples lives than reading written documents. This is ...
^^
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l individuals and events through videos. In conclusion, video records and written...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, still, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5137254902 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79335730969 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556862745098 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2413151695 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328900706852 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115122801832 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105640043956 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216147067777 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0901767181289 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.