When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Building always constitute the integral factor of a country’s construction. There is the heated debate over the issue whether the purpose of the building should be placed above its aesthetic value. I strongly believe that these factors are not conflicting and mutually beneficial.

There is no point in denying that the expenditure on the external charming of the building are no longer considered as the luxurious and insignificant work but incorporated as a core function of the city, especially in terms of economic marketability. No longer limited to such ordinary functions such as safety, durability, access to modern facilities, the requirements of the customer are comprehend and involved decorative details, visual qualities, including the ornamentation and furnishings. When choosing a destination, travellers predominantly have the tendency towards paying the primary attention on the aesthetic exterior of the building rather than consider its traditional and basic function. Apprehending their mindset, the business embark on focusing money on the high maintenance and outer design of their city’s building, as a facilitator, assisting the city to attracting tourist to flock to. As the result, it is compensated proportionally compared to their immense expenditure of money and endeavour, they are provided as large source of tourism income, making the contribution to the financial term and raising the eminence and prevalence of the city to the whole world. Moreover, with regard to the spiritual commodity, indicating the entire hidden beauty of the culture and religion which it is erected in is the worth mentioning value of the external appeal. Because of the divergence in architecture of the building in particular place, not only does it consolidate the surrounding landscape but each of them are also deemed to reflect on different begone story, helping people to understand the identity of the culture’s aspect and have a specific perspective about that. Besides, so effortless is it to distinguish one building to another due to these aboved factors, traveller would be engraved in mind deeply about the basic and crucial beauty of which.

However, on the other hand, it can be argued that no matter how crucial the artistic appearance is, people should take into account the real function such as drainage, lighting, heating systems as well as the arrangement of rooms and corridors which determine their building’s basic quality service. If a construction was incapable of meeting the needs of their owners, patrons and consumers or even compromise the quality, those outward appearances would be considered worthless and ignored. For instance, in India an architectural firm gained reputation for its one-of-a-kind designs and a few years later the designs were opined as unsafe construction when a large amount of the buildings collapsed just during a minor earthquake and caused a numerous casualty. In the light of this sample, giving the high consideration of the artistic exterior above its basic functionality not only jeopardized the lives of the residents but also inflicting the gigantic loss in terms of finance which had a profound impact on the development of one country.
From what has been discussed above, we draw the conclusion that the outward appearance is in no uncertain terms imperative to the image and cultural value of one country, even though, it should not be overstated nor sacrificed at the expense of real functionality. Both of them should be a slight mingling, contributing to the dominance of one city or country.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-08 bqcuong 78 view
2019-08-21 Nguyễn Đỗ Phước 11 view
2019-08-21 Nguyễn Đỗ Phước 11 view
2019-08-21 Nguyễn Đỗ Phước 78 view
2019-08-21 Nguyễn Đỗ Phước 78 view
Essays by user AnhKaMai :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Building always constitute the integral ...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t conflicting and mutually beneficial. There is no point in denying that the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'comprehended'.
Suggestion: comprehended
...s, the requirements of the customer are comprehend and involved decorative details, visual...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... basic and crucial beauty of which. However, on the other hand, it can be ar...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, moreover, so, well, for instance, in particular, such as, as well as, with regard to, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 41.998997996 181% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3040.0 1615.20841683 188% => OK
No of words: 563.0 315.596192385 178% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39964476021 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87110059796 4.20363070211 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14958487898 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 316.0 176.041082164 180% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561278863233 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 966.6 506.74238477 191% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.2180682115 49.4020404114 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 178.823529412 106.682146367 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.1176470588 20.7667163134 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125409050953 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391724952035 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385151270339 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0766375307609 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275046353885 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.6 13.0946893788 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.3001002004 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 192.0 78.4519038076 245% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.