Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender?
There are only 2 genders male and female in biological classification with completely different and strengths and weaknesses are existed with their gender. For about professions, they should equality.
First of all, all physical point of view, women are not as strong as men According to their biological body structure they are not very good at lifting heavy weight or working in a bad weather conditions. Their skin and muscles are not able to resist these condition. On the other hand women are beautiful and pretty. So if they are working as a customer services or make-up related provider, there will be a lot of advantages than men. For the mental, they are much complex which is incomparable such as empathic, numerical thinking and creativity. For example, an advertisement company needs to make a video for complain, the main idea of that creative work cannot come from specific gender because their thinking state is different on how to present through the audience mind.
On the other hand, IF someone profession is a technician, then it will depend on how much he/she can learn. As technical skills, gender is not required to achieve research or to develop a project. As a similar example, management skill, people prefer male manager but in reality they are the same since some country presidents are women and they can manage very well. This is the same for a company too. And another example for cooking, most of chef are woman and most of the mothers are cooking in the house while her husband are working outside. Bust most of the best chef in the world are male and they are highly interesting in their job.
Therefore, any job or any professions can be done not by the gender but by desire of a person. So any kind of professions can be trainable with powerful mind of willingness.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 67
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender? 73
- Coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five cities in Australia 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: HEAVY_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'heavyweight'?
Suggestion: heavyweight
...cture they are not very good at lifting heavy weight or working in a bad weather conditions....
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'condition'?
Suggestion: condition
...eavy weight or working in a bad weather conditions. Their skin and muscles are not able to...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, kind of, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80769230769 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65086386376 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6487362617 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.75 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195466722417 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549459607535 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057618348368 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119945846788 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539822909331 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.