Young people learn good behaviour more from movies and books than real-life experiences. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Opinions diverge on whether movies and books are the better approach to form a good behaviour rather than reality experience. In my judgement, I fervently censure this sentiment owing to rational reasons.
Admittedly, movies and books could not be a good methodology to learn good behaviours. This can be explained by the fact that in the hypercompetitive markets, film studios and book publishing companies are inclined to introduce multiple products which include rebel characters to gravitate more audiences. Specifically, they virtually exaggerate their character that they possess a series of behaviours recognised as immoral and violent. Take Thanos as an exemplary model, when this character is built up with a powerful and strongful appearance, young people tend to imitate his actions and consider him as an idol. Consequently, they can apply those actions into real life without the awareness of impacts. As a result, their cognition is fixed in an adverse mindset leading to various consequences for society.
In contrast, I believe that real-life experience can gain adolescents meaningful lessons on norm behaviours. To be more accurate, when they make a mistake and are criticised by other people, they can remember this vividly. They can realise their mistake and avoid rendering it in the future. Furthermore, reality experience can bring them an immense range of suitable behaviours in some certain cases. This is because movies and books can not reflect all of the aspects in our society whereas the field trip can.
To sum up, I starkly decry that adolescents should be taught norm behaviours through movies and books since there are still some dislocations. Therefore, parents have to nudge their children toward field experience to ensure the comprehensive growth of their offspring.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | thuthao2000 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | quan12341234 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | thuthao2000 | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-12 | tieuquynh | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-23 | trinhthanh1 | 61 | view |
- Task 1 The bar chart showed the percentage of school children learning to play four different musical instruments violin guitar piano drums in 2005 2010 2015
- The graph below gives information about U S government spending on research between 1980 and 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 11
- People believe that individuals who make a lot of money are the most successful Others say that those who contribute to society like scientists teacher are the most successful Discuss both and give your opinion 84
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of people accessing news via different media in one country in 2013 2015 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ecause movies and books can not reflect all of the aspects in our society whereas the fiel...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, so, still, therefore, whereas, in contrast, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39575971731 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95178027298 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628975265018 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2001194741 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.8 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201981166943 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656723659464 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604688013256 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119316118271 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248106698783 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ecause movies and books can not reflect all of the aspects in our society whereas the fiel...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, so, still, therefore, whereas, in contrast, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39575971731 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95178027298 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628975265018 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2001194741 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.8 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201981166943 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656723659464 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604688013256 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119316118271 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248106698783 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.