Developed countries should take more refugees from poorer countries Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Developed countries should take more refugees from poorer countries. Do you agree or disagree?

War and difficult habitable conditions can lead to citizen of those unfortunate nations to move out in search of better quality of life. Moreover, some people are of the opinion that the wealthy countries should give them shelter in their land. In this essay, I will highlight significant reasons why I disagree with this.

The primary argument against letting the refuges in is that the nation will end up splitting getting irritated with sharing their essential commodities such as food and land. In the USA, for example, the existing population was protesting against the entry of the middle-eastern refugees, as it would mean the country had more mouths to feed. This is, therefore, why many countries refrain from inviting such individuals into their territories.

Another notable reason to contradict the opinion of relocating refugees in developing countries is that it can lead to the local public losing their jobs to these new enterants. These individuals can be highly qualified professional, but the only reason they had to move was that the living standards were unbareable. This, furtheremore, results into them taking away the good high paying jobs from the citizens of the new location. Canada, for instance, invited many such refugees from Iran and Iraq during their war with the USA, but soon realised that since then, their unemployment rate doubled in two years.

In conclusion, although it seems like a noble casuse to let these individuals come and stay in countiries that are fortunate to have better standards of living, it can come as a high cost to the lives of the existing men and women of that country.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-09-25 elham mousavi 78 view
2024-08-20 Anmol Bal 73 view
2024-08-06 Anmol Bal 73 view
2024-07-30 elham mousavi 73 view
2024-07-21 elham mousavi 61 view
Essays by user KarishmaKaul :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r quality of life. Moreover, some people are of the opinion that the wealthy coun...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cant reasons why I disagree with this. The primary argument against letting the...
^^^
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is that the nation will end up splitting getting irritated with sharing their ess...
^^
Line 3, column 447, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uch individuals into their territories. Another notable reason to contradict the...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 614, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...unemployment rate doubled in two years. In conclusion, although it seems like a ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07777777778 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72077058801 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6450553114 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.636363636 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.09090909091 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160181211464 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593837867522 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533434536769 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0838973652278 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498248493248 0.056905535591 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.