Genetic engineering is a damaging trend. it should be limited. to what extent do you agree?
These days Genetic engineering has became more and more popular. People are surrounded products, food and medicines that were made or changed by scientists. This essay will discuss about a danger and possible consequences due to interrapting to the nature.
It’s known, the humanity has started to implement Genetic engineering more then 20 years ago. Everyone is acquainted the story of sheep Dolly. It was the famous experiment of creating absolutely new animal in the laboratory. The first time scientists achieved the success and told about it to whole world. They were greatly proud of themselves and Dolly was showed on Tv several times. However only minor part of people know that after some periode, Dolly was sick and passed away faster than it was expected.
In the same way, people know about generic modificated food and beverages. They eat and enjoy new sorts of modificated vegetable and fruit, consume diary from modificated animals regardless to what gen was changed and how it can influence their body and mind in the future. Many reputable doctors all over the world are worried about this issue and argue about implementation and possibility to continue these danger experiments.
Defenetly, science is always going ahead and nowadays Genetic engineering is solving problems of many deseases. The new medicines make our lives longer and healthy. However, beeing capable to use Genetic engineering for its purpose and usefulness, humanity plays a God and interrupt to creating new creatures. Already these days, rich people can order the color their child’s hair and eyes, or even the gender of the baby. They also can receive a newborn without usual pregnance in female body. Thus, in the near future science will be able to generate flawless people to order the customer request. It opens “Pandora box” for making variety kinds of human creatures and abnormal changing of human body.
In conclusion, I believe Genetic engineering has right to exist, but should be limited by governments. Also, it’s greatly important to aware people of possible danger after consuming modificated products.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | vmanpreet@outlook.com | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | Sheetal Bataniya | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | Srbkor19sandhu | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Humayan Kabir | 89 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Alishba | 61 | view |
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The older generations tend to have very traditional ideas about how people should live think and behave However some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generations for modern life To what extent do you agree or disagree w 77
- What are the keys to a successful family?What things can family do together to strengthen the family relationship? 61
- Genetic engineering is a damaging trend. it should be limited. to what extent do you agree? 84
- Animals should have the same rights as the rest. Do you agree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
These days Genetic engineering has became more and more popular. People are surro...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...d to implement Genetic engineering more then 20 years ago. Everyone is acquainted th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, then, thus, in conclusion, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31176470588 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72712093265 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614705882353 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3880087733 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1904761905 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104419821294 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.031367205387 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560515512122 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.065053737002 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429685310773 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.