Governments give lots of support to artists even though some people think it is a waste of money that could have been spent better elsewhere. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Although artisans are enormously supported by authorities, it is often considered to be a profligacy of public funds. In my opinion, while assisting artists fiscally helps in the promotion of culture, I think it puts tremendous burden on the national exchequer.
On the one hand, the provision of monetary aid to artists is tremendously helpful for perpetuating the ancestral cultural values, which is imperative to maintain the identity of a nation. In other words, when governments support dancers, actors and painters, they become able to organise more exhibitions and shows for representing the ethnic dances, plays, paintings. As an outcome, citizens get profound knowledge about their heritage and traditional lifestyles. However, I consider this idea to be absurd because uninterested and non-talented individuals prefer to be artists owing to the assurance of income which deteriorates the quality of artwork.
On the other hand, helping singers and actors financially is an encumbrance on the governing bodies. When authorities allocate funds for arts, it becomes arduous for them to finance education, health and infrastructure sector; consequently, citizens suffer from illiteracy, diseases and lack of facilities. For example, in 2017, Punjab government distributed approximately ten million rupees among embroiders for promoting the ethnic Punjabi embroidery work, but due to the fiscal deficit, they failed to improve the dilapidated rural primary schools. I agree with this view because the paramount responsibility of authorities is to provide social benefits to the public.
To conclude, even though culture can be promoted by giving money to artists, I believe that governments ought not to help them financially because it hinders government from providing the rudimentary services to the residents.
- Governments give lots of support to artists even though some people think it is a waste of money that could have been spent better elsewhere Discuss both views and give your opinion 91
- Some people think that in the 21st century people are enjoying a better quality of life compared to previous centuries.what is your opinion? 84
- When designing a building the intended use of the building should be taken into account rather than its outward appearance To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- Some people use Technology to take advice for their medical problems rather than seeing a doctor. what are the reasons behind this phenomenon? is this a positive or negative development according to you? 78
- Some people become famous at the young age. Is it a good thing or bad thing for them? 39
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e other hand, helping singers and actors financially is an encumbrance on the gov...
^^
Line 4, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... rudimentary services to the residents.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, so, while, for example, i think, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70588235294 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17824024779 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665441176471 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3039149871 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.090909091 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2727272727 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116999945081 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405375843924 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436999314066 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0811355667455 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04966381924 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.92 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.