Group or team activities can teach more important skills for life than those activities which are done alone.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
An activity that is carried out together through groups or teams in community groups, schools, companies or anywhere else can have a positive impact on each individual that can never be obtained when doing activities alone. I agree with this, because I think the activities together with the group are part of developing a sense of solidarity, empathy and emotional questioning with other living beings.
First and foremost, a joint activity will provide a new color for every emotional development in various aspects of each individual's abilities, for example the activities of children in elementary school who often exercise, study and play together. The first will foster a sense of sharing with one another when in a group someone needs help. The second sense of motivation will grow when there are several other friends who are so enthusiastic in learning or playing which are indirectly part of the snowball effect in the environment. The latter will foster a sense of cohesiveness and social sense for the actors in each group of children who are built in various collaborations.
Even so, activities that are carried out alone will have a lot of impact, especially in the development of emotions and skills to work together. Therefore, the impact is apathy, lack of empathy for other individuals, in addition to lack of cooperation with other audiences, so that they become a closed person, therefore own activity is not the right choice for every human being who is a social being. In addition, joint activities are needed in everyday life, school, company, or in various aspects to support the self-development of each individual so that they can continue to survive various pressures of emotional problems, life burdens, workloads, insecurity. and others personally.
In conclusion, joint activities need to be maintained and set instead of doing it alone in order to generate a sense of empathy, solidarity and self-confidence so that it does not cause a closed personality, difficulty working together and low ability to survive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-31 | Agus Ismansyah | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-31 | Agus Ismansyah | 56 | view |
| 2021-12-31 | Agus Ismansyah | 61 | view |
| 2021-12-30 | Agus Ismansyah | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-30 | Agus Ismansyah | 73 | view |
- The government s Investment in artis Musi and theatre ia a waste of money Governments should invest these find in public services instead To What extent to di you agree with this statement 73
- Improvements in health education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations However the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas To what extent do you agree or disagree w 73
- people in all modern societies use drugs but today s youth are experimenting with illegal and illegal drugs and at an increasingly early age some sociologists claim that parents and other members of society often set a poor sample discusses the causes and 73
- Research shows that the characteristics we are born with have a far greater influence on our personality and development than any experience we may have in our lives which one do you think is the most influential 61
- Group or team activities can teach more important skills for life than those activities which are done alone Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from own knowledge or experience 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...he snowball effect in the environment. The latter will foster a sense of cohesiven...
^^^
Line 5, column 671, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
..., life burdens, workloads, insecurity. and others personally. In conclusion, jo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, therefore, thus, even so, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22054380665 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97312281896 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519637462236 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.5756036594 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.090909091 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0909090909 20.7667163134 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.81818181818 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187946981165 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071773139244 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452937690165 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115033070168 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324557277312 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 22.0 9.78957915832 225% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.