A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Although there are many organizations have been voice-up for animal rights recently, some people are still supporting to the idea that animal research and animal-based dietary requirements are vitally important. In my opinion, I believe people should minimize employing animals as their test subjects and should respect animal rights.
To begin with, if we consider the necessity to harm animals for food and research needs, as omnivorous beings, humans are dependent on animal meat. However, with the advancement of science, nowadays, there are many alternatives to satisfy the need of animal meat in other ways. For instance, there are a plethora of vitamins and supplements are available in the market which people can utilize instead of killing animals. Moreover, scientists are developing artificial meat, which is entirely being developed without harming animals. If people could change their habits to use such products, animal lives would be greatly saved. Another leading cause for the violation of animals right is the usage of test subjects. Many argue that without using animals it is hard to test drugs and other medical treatments. In order to minimize animal involvements, researchers can do computer-based simulations where ever possible.
Furthermore, it is vital to take into account that animals also have rights the same as humans. To maintain the balance of the ecosystem, every animal should be protected and respected. People tend to believe that they belong to the highest level of food-chain and as a result, the permission was granted for them to kill other living beings. This is a highly egoistic mentality which is harming the nature and the natural order of life. In the olden days, people were not so developed and therefore it is justifiable to use animals for their benefits. However, now things have been changed and people have developed exponentially compared to the past. Therefore, people should meticulously consider the animals right and protect them for future generations.
In conclusion, although animal-based food and research are important, nowadays there are many alternatives. Therefore, people should more concern about protecting animal rights.
- In today's world of advanced science and technology, we still greatly value our artists such as musicians, painters and writers. What can the arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot? 84
- Some people say that art eg painting music poetry can be made by everyone whereas others believe that it can only be made by those with special ability Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Some people believe that some individuals are born with leadership skills while others think that the individuals can develop those leadership skills Discuss both sides and state your opinion 78
- Shopping has become a favourite past time for many young people. Why is that the case? Should they be encouraged to utilise their free time in a better way? 56
- In many countries some students live with their families while studying but other students prefer to attend universities in other cities Do the benefits of living away from home outweigh the disadvantages 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1868.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4780058651 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82081866016 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554252199413 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4676987796 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3157894737 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9473684211 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05263157895 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.462031763473 0.244688304435 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144269153009 0.084324248473 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727915522281 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299327414136 0.151304729494 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519637328442 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.