An increasing number of professionals, such as doctors and teachers are leaving their own poorer countries to work in developed countries. What problems does this cause? What solutions can you suggest to deal with this situation?
To majority of highly-qualified workers living in the third world moving to economically advanced countries for better life quality seems as a rational decision therefore they leave their homelands. In this essay I will shed light on economics destruction problem caused by this resolution and new competitive salary system implementation to tackle this pervasive problem and reverse it.
It is evident that with sinking number of skilled-workers, Gross Revenue of the developing countries will extremely collapse. The reason why companies in developing countries fail to compete in global market and get into bankruptcy is an acute shortage in specialized experts. Not only the serious deficit of highly-skilled staff, such as engineers, scientist etc., to develop the economy, but also absence of mentors for young professionals to guide them in industry is hazardous for future economy development.
A means to an end of rapidly diminishment of talents of the third world, lies through integration of standardized salary system which will motivate them to stay in their homeland. What system does is that it divides employees in several tiers, such as junior, senior, lead etc., where each tier has three levels. The period during which employee will be evaluated for benefits and accomplishment they brought to the company is every six months. For instance, CEO, COO or HR will decide whether to move up through tier or level the employee or not. With increasing tier, salary package will grow, thus advancing responsibilities accordingly. By these advancement of valuing employees, employers will be able to keep their leading experts with them.
In conclusion, in order to motivate highly-skilled professionals living in third world not to leave their premises, we have to value them by implementing new wage system by giving appropriate salary package, which is competitive with respect to one in developed countries, to worthy ones evaluated by nominated committee. Turning blind eye on this problem, will collapse the economic fate of the developing countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | kabcpc | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | Javad-68 | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | sudheerssmg | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | Faraj.khalikov | 89 | view |
| 2019-09-09 | NPATEL123 | 73 | view |
- In some countries, the number of people who visit art galleries is declining. What are the reasons for this? How can we solve this problem? 84
- Some people think that big international sporting events are not worthwhile for the host country.Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Many people today use their phones for sending texts more than talking. What are the reasons for this? Are there more advantages than disadvantages? 89
- Things like puzzles, board games, and pictures can contribute to a child’s development. What would you give a child to help him/her develop and why? Give details and examples in your explanation. 11
- Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers, whereas others argue that homewrok plays an important role in the education of children 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 645, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this advancement' or 'these advancements'?
Suggestion: this advancement; these advancements
...ancing responsibilities accordingly. By these advancement of valuing employees, employers will be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, so, therefore, third, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1766.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48447204969 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11697447523 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624223602484 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3439937047 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.846153846 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7692307692 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203274020088 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704417514456 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501608920963 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123633467787 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325538249054 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.