Many people today use their phone for sending texts more than talking? what are the reason for this? Are there more advantages than disadvantages?
In modern days, sending messages from a smartphone is widely popular than voice or video call due to myriad individuals choosing to do that. Two most common reasons behind this are SMS are cost-effective and development of messaging apps. Even though there could be some disadvantages, but advantage outweigh disadvantages as the clarity of conversation than talking and time consuming.
Firstly, call costs are higher than texts, as most of the phone company charges more for voice calls. So, when it comes to spending money people usually choose the less costly option to communicate. For example, in Bangladesh per minute call charge is 1.60 tk whereas per message cost only .65 poisa. Another fact is in the markets, there is various kinds of messaging applications which has a number of attractive options such as emojis, GIF, stickers. Thus, it is quite famous, especially among young people. For instance, a documentary shows that the new generation is more likely to use texting apps because there are different kind of option to express their feelings. This is why the popularity of sending texts is higher.
Moreover, the trend had several advantages, namely, it is time consuming and a clear option of communication. Typing a message only takes a few minutes and rather than writing a full sentence an emoji could do the work perfectly. On the other hand, speaking on the phone does not have this facility. To give a clear example one can express he/she is happy by sending happy GIF which takes only a moment, however, when taking he/she need to say the whole sentence. In addition, the conversation is clearly understandable while sent as an SMS. An example is network problem is really common around the world as a result receiver may not hear the sound properly, which could create misunderstanding where a text is a clear-cut for communications.
In conclusion, an increasing number of people prefer texting than calling. Overpriced call rate and smart apps are reasons for this. As it takes less time to send text and clarity of conversation this process has more advantages than disadvantages.
- there is a increase of noise in our daily life now a days.why is this a problem?what can be done to reduce it 61
- Fast food is a part of life in some places some people think this has a bad effect in lifestyle and diet do you agree disagree 72
- more people are spending their free time watching movies why is this is it a good thing or bad thing 74
- Weddings are more expensive in many countries comparison present and past What is the reason behind this Is this a positive or a negative development 85
- Some people think that watching sport is wastage of time during leisure time. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are various kinds'?
Suggestion: there are various kinds
... poisa. Another fact is in the markets, there is various kinds of messaging applications which has a n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 633, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'kinds'?
Suggestion: kinds
...exting apps because there are different kind of option to express their feelings. Th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, thus, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05428571429 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87887307884 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605714285714 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6448028658 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1052631579 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4210526316 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78947368421 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331295215933 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921889005056 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833427217563 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214688087841 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108448337238 0.056905535591 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.