News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words. What is your opinion about this?
In recent years TV and newspapers have been incorporating images to their news stories to ensure people get at first what the story is about. This mechanism has brough the attention from the media on how people react and receive their messages on different topics. This effect has shown the importance to use additional material to every topic that needs to be communicated.
Firstly, it is knowing that some part of their audience believes that using visual material causes good impact on the way that they act to different situations. Thus, reporters have realized the need to be supported by images when they give news that require such impact to the audience. For instance, a snow fall warning needs to be accompanied by maps to show receivers exactly where the issue is and hoe them need to be protected.
Secondly, it should not be forgotten the other portion of the audience that for many reasons cannot put attention on images. This audience needs to react on words rather than pictures. They believe that by having words they can actually, identify each situation have an idea what serious the news is and move to the next step. For example, people working in factories they cannot lose their attention on their duties; but can still hear any news and communicate each other what they need to do.
Thus, in my opinion the media sectors need to combine both activities in their news stories. They need to impact their audience in such way that receivers still get the right messages by using only words or pictures or both. At the end of the day is their responsibility to cover both sides of the population and make sure they would react on each message provided.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-28 | ielts_tony | 67 | view |
| 2022-07-07 | Hemantbali | 61 | view |
| 2022-02-09 | padmaJ | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-06 | Kulpreet Kaur | 87 | view |
| 2021-09-10 | tiencdh | 73 | view |
- Smart devices have put all of the world s information at our fingertips The benefits of this development are obvious but what are the drawbacks 73
- Technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today In the not too distant future technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom Do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words What is your opinion about this Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own know 56
- In some countries it is thought advisable that children begin formal education at four years old while in others they do not have to start school until they are seven or eight How far do you agree with either of these views 73
- All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them Do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[3]
Message: The verb know is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'knows'
Suggestion: knows
...eeds to be communicated. Firstly, it is knowing that some part of their audience believ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...eeds to be communicated. Firstly, it is knowing that some part of their audience believ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, for example, for instance, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78694158076 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44678848547 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536082474227 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.449577227 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.153846154 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166824721102 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631098508098 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570278847349 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104572707618 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630585726007 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.