Some people think that activities of free-time shall be planned while others disagree. Discuss both sides and include examples and relevant data from your own experience.
Whether or not leisure time activities should be arranged in advance has always been a matter of vigorous debates. Some people claim that such planning is necessary, whereas others tend to contradict them. The issue provokes strong arguments from both sides, which will be discussed in this essay.
On the one hand, one of the most significant reasons to prepare beforehand seems to be the lower expenditures. For instance, booking hotels or tours several months in advance is known to be much cheaper. Secondly, people appear to have more options to choose from planning activities in advance. Nowadays, more and more people prefer tourism for their vacations, which results in scarcity of facilities available for booking. Finally, even the most trivial deal might fail without due preparation. For example, no flights to the desired destinations might be available or even such unexpected nuisances as visa problems or lack of appropriate garments.
On the other hand, waiting for planned events might have a negative impact on people's work. Some people tend to neglect their duties anticipating scheduled events. Such negligence might result in reprimands or event severance. Another aspect might be that sudden positive information provides far more profound pleasure or cause rejoice. Planning everything in advance, in this case, deprives people of such outbursts of positive emotions. Finally, some companies tend to sell tours for extremely lucrative prices when, for example, the seat has not been purchased.
All in all, organizing any activities in advance seems to be a rather rational strategy ensuring a high quality of services for reasonable prices. At the same time, spontaneous decisions are also not completely devoid of benefits.
- You ride a bicycle to work, but there is a problem with the parking. Write a letter to the manager of the Parking Management Company.Dear Sir/Madam,I am writing to express my deep concern about the local bicycle parking behind the office centre. As a resp 56
- In many countries, people today are living in a "throwaway society", where things are used in a short time and then thrown away. What are its causes. What are its problems. 11
- In many countries, people today are living in a "throwaway society", where things are used in a short time and then thrown away. What are its causes. What are its problems. 11
- Some people say that schools should spend more money on the best equipment others say that more experienced teachers should be hired Discuss both views and give your opinion 75
- The cultures of many coutries around the world become more similar than they used to be. What are the reasons for this trend? Is it positive or negative? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether or not leisure time activities should b...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
Whether or not leisure time activities should be arran...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44525547445 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74628185767 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631386861314 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.0416953338 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.7647058824 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1176470588 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52941176471 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184554245729 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599789646281 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473168890887 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12113676138 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064486691564 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.