Some people think that recruiting companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others consider they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is an argument while hiring staff where a proportion of people think that it is a good idea to hire someone who are innovative and are capable to work on their own while the other proportion suggest that they should recruit workforce who should work as a team and follow their manager’s orders in a proper way. In the era of modern society companies will need people with both the qualities, we will discuss in this essay why staff with quality of team-player outweigh the innovative people.
Firstly, according to a survey by Forbes, introverts are the ones who generate majority of new ideas and work on them. Though they are backbone of innovative group, but they find it difficult to assemble in groups and share their opinion while in a meeting or anywhere else and like to work alone. Furthermore, it is tough for them to integrate into a team and come in line with other members to work together. For example, an innovative team member of a group tends to concentrate on his new idea and cannot concentrate on the actual work to be completed as a team within the time frame.
On the other hand, team-work is crucial for any business. When all the members work as a team, it will ensure accomplishment of aim of the company apart from success of an individual. For an instance, if there is a critical project whose deadline is very tight, it will be collaborative work which counts. According to an article publishes in Times Magazine, a company which has more team players tend to be successful not only because of their joint effort but because of the fact that they participate actively in meetings and brainstorming sessions where most of the ideas are discussed and results in outcome.
To summarize, both innovative and team-players are equally important in certain situations, people working in a team are more effective at achieving targets and bringing up new ideas as a team. In my opinion, staff working as a team is more crucial for a company than innovative and independently working members as they outnumber the advantages of having them in a team.
- Modern technology, such as personal computers and the internet have made it possible to do their work from home at least part of the time, instead of going to an office everyday. what are the advantages and disadvantages of this. 61
- Group and team activities are more important than the activities done alone, because they teach us important life skills. Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think that recruiting companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others consider they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions. Discuss both views and give 56
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged.Others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather than competebecome more useful adults.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 67
- It seems that many companies today are becoming much more concerned with profit than with happiness of their workers. How could companies take care of their workers in the future. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 300, Rule ID: I_A[1]
Message: Did you mean 'am' (first person of "to be")?
Suggestion: am
...team and follow their managers orders i a proper way. In the era of modern societ...
^
Line 5, column 41, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'for any'.
Suggestion: for any
...On the other hand, team-work is crucial for any for any business. When all the members work as ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'of the'.
Suggestion: of the
...m, it will ensure accomplishment of aim of the of the company apart from success of an indivi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 710, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
... because of their joint effort but also because of the fact that they participate actively in meetings a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, while, apart from, for example, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2108.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 442.0 315.596192385 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76923076923 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78129028392 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490950226244 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 680.4 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.7597436277 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.75 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37875906561 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128130647141 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074670625062 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252985935789 0.151304729494 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615884372823 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 9.78957915832 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.