Do you agree that people easily learn from the friends beside them? Use specific examples and evidences to support your answer.
In the modern era, a friend has played a prominent role in all societies. Because it is of paramount importance, people have always searched for ways to enhance friendship quality. Whether or not human readily effects to their friends, is controversial. I content that people usually learn many things from their friend rather than other people. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
The first important factor to be mentioned is that people usually choose friends who have the same age as themselves. To elaborate on my point, friends are usually having the same ages; hence, they have able to understand each other in the best ways. So, they usually speak to each other at all times. As a result, they try to solve their problem, and they learn many things from them. This situation especially a cure for children and juveniles. They try to imitate to their friend. Consider a young boy for instance. He spends many times with his friends, and he always wants to wear and speak the same as his friend. He always listens to a friend rather than parents.
Another reason which deserves some word here is that individual spend many times with their friends. To shed more light on this matter, since people spend many times with somebody, they try to imitate from them. A special person says that people become the same as 5 persons who spend many times with them. So, people learn many things from their friend. To illustrate this idea let’s consider this the following example. When I was in university, I lived in dormitory where a lot of students from many parts varied states live and they each have a special behavior, I spent most of my spare time with my friends who were Turk and Kurd and I could say that my behavior, my manner of wearing and especially my beliefs affected by them. For example, sometimes we went to restaurants and after eating the food we discussed different things, after that I thought about their opinions and sometimes I changed some belief of mine.
All in all, considering the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that friends have strong effects on people. I believe that people not only choose persons who have the same age as them but also choose people as a friend that have the same idea; therefore, they influence each other.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-01 | pounez | 76 | view |
| 2021-09-02 | amir_pdn | 87 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | Kumari Soni | 60 | view |
| 2019-10-11 | msafaie | 63 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | mohamadjhr | 68 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing sports can teach people lessons about life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 75
- Some people argue that high sales of some popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising not the real need of consumer. Do you agree or disagree? 76
- tpo 22 70
- tpo 60 Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories mentioned in the reading passage 3
- TPO 25 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
...for ways to enhance friendship quality. Whether or not human readily effects to their friends,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 23, column 214, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to people'
Suggestion: to people
...ve the same age as them but also choose people as a friend that have the same idea; th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1952.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84367245658 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.461958661 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496277915633 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.0 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.4318405175 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8695652174 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5217391304 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5652173913 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141931227557 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496358011808 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545192722218 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100992050794 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00718463559865 0.0645574589148 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.