Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wait until the class or meeting is o

Essay topics:

Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?

-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away

-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade

-Say nothing

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People are not perfect and can make mistakes while speaking in front of a group of others. Personally, I think that it is always better to correct a person if he or she made a mistake in a private and quiet atmosphere. There are a few reasons why I hold this opinion.
First of all, people should not correct others in front of listeners because it can affect the reputation of the speaker. This is especially crucial if the speaker is a teacher. In order for children to listen to their educator in a classroom and learn from him, they have to respect him. If students do not appreciate their teacher, during the lessons they talk to each other instead of following the educator. In this way, they do not perceive a study material. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I was in school, my history teacher was a young one, who just graduated a college. High school students did not take him as someone who they supposed to listen, they always interrupted him if he confused dates of historical events, and as soon as he did not have enough experience in dealing with teenagers, he was not able to calm us down and make us learn his school subject. In fact, my knowledge of history was weak. That is why it is so important to let a person talk and correct him when he is alone.
Secondly, interrupting people while them speaking is rude. All people are different and everyone has moments when we cannot concentrate on the things we have to. Reasons for that can vary. For instance, when recently my husband was in a hospital, I was so stressed out because I was thinking about his health constantly and simply could not concentrate on my job. Unfortunately, at the same time, I had an important project to work on and had to give a speech in front of clients of the company I was working for. In fact, during a presentation, I made a mistake but nobody pointed on that since all my colleagues are educated people, who know how to behave appropriately. After the presentation, I understood my mistake and on the next day admitted it, which raised appreciation of my colleagues toward me. This example illustrates the value of being polite with others.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that it is crucial to point to someone`s mistakes privately. This is because it helps to keep a discipline of the auditory and indicates excellence of manners of the person who found the mistake.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-03 kkang 76 view
2020-01-03 Bonjourkmm 3 view
2019-12-31 mahdi.sdt 76 view
2019-12-29 lucy2244 73 view
2019-12-21 marysv 70 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Dozer :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a few reasons why I hold this opinion. First of all, people should not correct ...
^^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs of the person who found the mistake.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in fact, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2030.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61363636364 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76929743156 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515909090909 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5832719685 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5833333333 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0855743762543 0.236089414692 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0258130590488 0.076458572812 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0211069198586 0.0737576698707 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0473181509116 0.150856017488 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019456692512 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.