promotion should begiven based on seniority or performance
Every employee has a dream of getting a promotion in his organization. Some organization believes that the best way to give promotions is based on seniority; others think that it should be based on performance. There are certain advantages to both approaches.
If you choose the candidate for getting the promotion based on his seniority, you can get a man who is more experienced and loyal to the company. Furthermore, there is a great chance that he has some leadership qualities. On the other side, if you choose the candidate with greater performance, you will get the person who had been more beneficial to the company. Moreover, this could make the other employee give better performance in their work.
In my view, it is better to give promotions based on performance, rather than giving it based on seniority. There are certain reasons for that. Firstly, if you chose a candidate based on the performance, you are giving it to the person who has been the most beneficial to the company. Because if you give it on the based of seniority other employees who are working very hard for this company, will think that their efforts are not appreciated. Moreover, the senior person might think that he is getting the promotion only because of his seniority and might become complacent about his work.
Second of all, if you chose a candidate based on his performance, you will motivate others in improving their performance. For instance, last month, our company has decided to give the promotion based on the candidate’s performance in the last year. The person who gets the promotion was working very hard for the last few years but never gets promoted till now. We all saw that her hard work was appreciated and this motivated us to also improve our work. From then on, everybody in our company has started to work hard because we knew that at the end of this year, the person with the best performance will get the promotion.
That's why I believe that it is better to give promotions based on performance because not only it will be better for the hard-working person but also it will motivate others to improve their performance.
- newspaper 70
- promotion should begiven based on seniority or performance 66
- young people enjoy more life than older people 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- schools should ask their students to evaluate their teachers 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...st performance will get the promotion. Thats why I believe that it is better to give...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, then, for instance, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81029810298 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75693549016 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.40379403794 0.524837075471 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 561.6 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5822370664 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6111111111 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233934681584 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842657996434 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732796458432 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158234195287 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553600329716 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.68 8.01818996416 83% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 86.8835125448 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.