schools should ask their students to evaluate their teachers
It is critically important to have a decent education during the initial years of life. Even though most people learn something during their whole life, knowledge acquired through school has great value. Some people would not like the idea of evaluating teachers by their students because it gives students some power over their teachers; however, I completely agree with the statement because the advantages of it outweigh the disadvantages.
First of all, many times teachers become complacent in their work; by asking students to evaluate their teachers, school is motivating their teachers to perform better. Sometimes teachers think that they do not need to change their teaching methods because they are doing it for years and become lax about their techniques. For instance, when I was in school Mrs. Pooja Pathak, our English teacher, was teaching in our school for the past twenty years. My mother also had gone to the same school and when she was in school Mrs. Pathak also used to teach English. At that time she has really good teaching methods, but over time she becomes complacent and nowadays she doesn't care about her teaching techniques. So, if we include the evaluating system we students can give an honest review about it and there is a possibility that she gets motivated to teach better.
Second of all, students can point out their teachers’ mistakes, and this will help teachers to identify and correct their errors. This will helps to make them a better teacher and to adapt better teaching techniques. For example, my brother’s school has adopted this evaluating method for their teachers. Their Social Studies teacher repeat himself very often, so his class became very boring. The students had decided to write a review for that teacher, and they issued the problem in their review. As a result, that teacher can be identified that he does not need to repeat himself and by eliminating this he improved in his teaching.
In conclusion, a school should ask their students to evaluate their teachers because it will inspire them to not become lax about their job and also they help to spot their mistakes and give a chance to correct it.
- newspaper 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- young people enjoy more life than older people 66
- Some people like to spend their leisure time doing activites with a lot of people Others prefer to spend their leisure in quite ways by themselves or with one other person Which do you prefer 50
- promotion should begiven based on seniority or performance 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 668, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...she becomes complacent and nowadays she doesnt care about her teaching techniques. So,...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 140, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
...ify and correct their errors. This will helps to make them a better teacher and to ad...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, really, second, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1813.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 364.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98076923077 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45845046445 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516483516484 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7307685381 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.722222222 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.549026835952 0.236089414692 233% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172816224996 0.076458572812 226% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.172750058031 0.0737576698707 234% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.388174025961 0.150856017488 257% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114751305525 0.0645574589148 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.