Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In general, it stands to reason that every society holds some ideas in high regard due to various reasons. One good example of such ideas is the tendency of some workers to choose the variety of tasks in which they would do in their work area. This is mainly due to the fact that it could influence on the future of the society. Having said that, due to the emphasis put on this idea, many tend to analyze it and express their opinions in regard to its aspects. One point of controversy is that some of the workers tend to repeat similar tasks during the workday. One specific reoccurring idea brought up is that workers tend to do similar works during the workday or they tend to improve their efficiency by accepting variety tasks to do. Many concur with this notion and I count myself as one of them. In the lines below, I will delve into the reasons for this opinion by pointing out 2/3 of them.
One point worth mentioning here is that by doing a variety of tasks by individuals, they would improve their ability to accomplish several works and also they would increase their own self-confidence, hence it would help them to progress in their workplace. For instance, let's take a construction worker, in which s/he could do a wide range variety of tasks. As s/he has a good experience in accomplishing several constructive tasks, s/he would be succeeding to improve her/his position.
Another equally important reason is that by doing more variety of tasks by the workers, as they would become multifaceted individuals, their work security would be increased. Indeed, with an increase in the diversity and importance of the tasks that they would accept, the need of their employer would be increased to them and subsequently, they would have a good work security.
The final point to be mentioned is that as the workers are going to be more experienced, and their ability would be increased by accepting variety tasks, they could be able to demand their employer to increase their income. According to their attained abilities, their employer does not want to miss them at all. Eventually, they would succeed in their demand, in which they wanted to earn more money by doing same hours or even less.
To recapitulate, all the reasons presented above bring us to the conclusion that if workers accept more tasks in their work area, it would be more beneficial for them. This is due to the reasons given, which are progressing in their workplace, increasing their work security and increasing their salary.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to 70
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 76
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. 60
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 496, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...pects. One point of controversy is that some of the workers tend to repeat similar tasks du...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 187, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'reasons'' or 'reason's'?
Suggestion: reasons'; reason's
...beneficial for them. This is due to the reasons given, which are progressing in their w...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, so, for instance, in general, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2081.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78390804598 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59226773849 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448275862069 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 632.7 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7067336703 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.611111111 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27777777778 5.45110844103 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224180642047 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906413682694 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780809580074 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141844480135 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479157014598 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.