Having free time is good when you are in college or high school. It is a great opportunity to rest, but also, to look for others opportunities aside your common routine. Many times, the students face the decision of either finding a part-time job or taking a part-time course, both of which have their own advantages and disadvantages. However, in my opinion it is better to take a part-time course.
Firstly, a part-time job can not only be another way of raising money, but also be important for having experience in your field of interest. It can allow you to expand your network, and to get acquainted with abilities required to your future career. But it can also be exhausting in many ways, mainly because you will have to work with clients and for companies with a lot more of responsibility than with a part-time course. Not only this, your mistakes will have effects to the businees, even if in a small scale.
On the other hand, a part-time course is more suited for a student. When I was having my degree, my advisor always told me to make the most as possible from the university. If you participate in part-time courses, or summer courses whitin the university or college, you definitely will be enhancing your knowledge. It is important to keep in mind that your main goal as a student is not to raise money, unless really needed, but to learn as much as possible. Taking more courses will also be good for your future career, as much as having experience in some cases, and also can expand your network. Also, your mistakes will only affect you in the in almost all situations.
Finally, it is necessary to dinstinguish between each step of your life. In my point of view, having more courses can be better for a student than having a part-time job, as it would be focused on learning. The student would have the oportunity to even discover others fields that he may be interested in, or to learn something that he wouldn't otherwise. As for the part-time job, it will eventually come one day that the student will have the opportunity to work and have experience, but it will be better for him to do so with more knowledge acquired in his courses.
- Do you agree or disagree that a celebrity should set a good example for young people 80
- Fiction is just another name for story telling It s much better to read fact based books 60
- Single mothers face more issues to stablish a stable life 73
- Would you prefer to take a part time course or have a part time job during your summer vacation 73
- Do you think that daily homework is necessary for students 80
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 336, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ested in, or to learn something that he wouldnt otherwise. As for the part-time job, it...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, really, so, as for, in my opinion, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59689922481 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63752783715 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478036175711 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 571.5 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9338102782 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8333333333 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05555555556 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415539204063 0.236089414692 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15241914758 0.076458572812 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102916793877 0.0737576698707 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297668158306 0.150856017488 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598556175968 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 336, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ested in, or to learn something that he wouldnt otherwise. As for the part-time job, it...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, really, so, as for, in my opinion, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59689922481 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63752783715 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478036175711 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 571.5 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9338102782 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8333333333 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05555555556 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415539204063 0.236089414692 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15241914758 0.076458572812 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102916793877 0.0737576698707 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297668158306 0.150856017488 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598556175968 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.