Tpo5
In this set of material, the reading passage states that there is not an universal agreement on the use of the great houses-massive stone building with hundreds of rooms- of belong to the settlements of Chaco Canton in the American Southwest. The reading expresses three theories for type of the use of the great houses from archaeologists' language and support them, however the professor finds all hypothesizes unconvincing. The information the lecture provides contradicts the fact outlined in the reading.
First of all, the reading declares that these houses were entirely residential and also they are similar to the apartment buildings of native American Southwest which people have been staying for years even centuries, in contrast the professor claims that it is true that the outside of the houses looks like native buildings in Southwest of America, however inside of great houses is different. If the houses were residential, it would have a lot of fireplaces for cooking or heating of a large number of people, however fewer fireplaces were found in there.
Second, the author of reading believes that these houses may have used for storing food supplies like grain maze which was the main crop in the Chaco, on the contrary the lecture contends that any grain of maze or maze's containers did not found neither in rooms nor in the floor.
Third, the reading proposes that since a lot of broken pots discovered in a mound near of one house as known Pueblo Alto, it is possible that great houses were suitable for taking place the rituals. These broken pots were belonging to containers which people were eating food into; conversely the lecture refutes this theory. The professor states that among the broken pots found a lot of other materials like building's materials as stone and plaster and so on, consequently this mound could have been a trash mound and the workers were feeding their meals into the pots.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-03 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 70 | view |
- do you agree or disagree? working near a relative can be effective. 76
- Tpo6 3
- Do you agree or dis agree? because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability of plan and organize. 78
- Do you agree or disagree?it is better to make friends with intelligent people than with the people who have a good sense of humor. 85
- do you agree or disagree? young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities . 31
Comments
Essay evaluation report
The reading expresses three theories for type of the use of the great houses
Description: can you re-write this sentence?
containers did not found
containers did not find
since a lot of broken pots discovered in a mound
since a lot of broken pots are discovered in a mound
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Words: 322 250
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Always add a blank line between paragraphs.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 22 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 12
No. of Words: 322 250
No. of Characters: 1578 1200
No. of Different Words: 162 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.236 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.901 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.538 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 109 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 80 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 53 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 34 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 35.778 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 15.193 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.778 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.432 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.432 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.134 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...eading passage states that there is not an universal agreement on the use of the g...
^^
Line 2, column 489, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...of fireplaces for cooking or heating of a large number of people, however fewer fireplaces were f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 217, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[2]
Message: The verb belong is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'belonged'
Suggestion: belonged
...ng place the rituals. These broken pots were belonging to containers which people were eating ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 217, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ng place the rituals. These broken pots were belonging to containers which people were eating ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'consequently', 'conversely', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'in contrast', 'first of all', 'it is true', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.290697674419 0.261695866417 111% => OK
Verbs: 0.145348837209 0.158904122519 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0697674418605 0.0723426182421 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0406976744186 0.0435111971325 94% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0174418604651 0.0277247811725 63% => OK
Prepositions: 0.177325581395 0.128828473217 138% => OK
Participles: 0.046511627907 0.0370669169778 125% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.5819633723 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00872093023256 0.0208969081088 42% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.136627906977 0.128158765124 107% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00872093023256 0.0158828679856 55% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00872093023256 0.0114777025283 76% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1926.0 1645.83664459 117% => OK
No of words: 322.0 271.125827815 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.98136645963 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.04852973271 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.350931677019 0.374372842146 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.257763975155 0.287516216867 90% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.173913043478 0.187439937562 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.108695652174 0.113142543107 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5819633723 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524844720497 0.539623497131 97% => OK
Word variations: 54.562563499 53.8517498576 101% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0529801325 69% => OK
Sentence length: 35.7777777778 21.7502111507 164% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.8536444575 49.3711431718 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 214.0 132.220823453 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.7777777778 21.7502111507 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 0.878197800319 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 61.5541752933 50.5018328374 122% => OK
Elegance: 2.52857142857 1.90840788429 132% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.195354053775 0.142949733639 137% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0476302321094 0.0787303798458 60% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.7572408006 0.631733273073 120% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.145813692372 0.139662658121 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.433931212927 0.414875509568 105% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0824039133616 0.0530846634433 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.26048565121 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.1766004415 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.