As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
The purpose of technology was to help and boost the human productivity. In the pre-technology era, a major part of a human was consumed doing time consuming menial jobs. While technology takes care of such menial and trite things, humans can focus of on the larger intellectual businesses and on further advancements. With technological inventions we can achieve more in a lesser amount time thus greatly increasing our efficiency. One of the greatest outcomes of our technological advancement has been mass production. With exponential growth of the earth’s population, mass production aids the purpose of serving the masses in a restrained time. Moreover it has not only changed the face of consumerism but also is a great part of the economies and GDPs of nations. Another example of technology being making humans work more efficiently is in medical field. For example microscopic brain surgeries not are able to go to places where it was not humanly possible but also has reduced the number of fatalities considerably.
Furthermore, I’d like to add that technology is a bi-product of humans’ advancement. It exists because of the ability of the human brain to conceive and conceptualize it. Hence instead of deteriorating, I’d like to point out that our brain is advancing. We are much ahead of our predecessors and go beyond the mediocre ideation. Ideas that were just a goal and a dream has been made possible due to humans’ brain to conceive and conceptualize it and create appropriate technology to achieve it.
I’d like to conclude that conception of technology is not only a sign human progression but has also increased human productivity exponentially. Thus instead of deterioration, dependence technology is an indication of higher thinking abilities of the humans.
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 54
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 65
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 58
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 50
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 654, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...erving the masses in a restrained time. Moreover it has not only changed the face of con...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'moreover', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'as to', 'for example']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.246987951807 0.240241500013 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.165662650602 0.157235817809 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0843373493976 0.0880659088768 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.066265060241 0.0497285424764 133% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0451807228916 0.0444667217837 102% => OK
Prepositions: 0.117469879518 0.12292977631 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0481927710843 0.0406280797675 119% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.31126957115 2.79330140395 119% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0301204819277 0.030933414821 97% => OK
Particles: 0.00301204819277 0.0016655270985 181% => OK
Determiners: 0.0843373493976 0.0997080785238 85% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00602409638554 0.0249443105267 24% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.00602409638554 0.0148568991511 41% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1813.0 2732.02544248 66% => OK
No of words: 288.0 452.878318584 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.29513888889 6.0361032391 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.58838876751 90% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.364583333333 0.366273622748 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.305555555556 0.280924506359 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.236111111111 0.200843997647 118% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.184027777778 0.132149295362 139% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31126957115 2.79330140395 119% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 219.290929204 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.48968727796 111% => OK
Word variations: 55.0891063899 55.4138127331 99% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6194690265 78% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.380412469 77% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5798136031 59.4972553346 51% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.3125 141.124799967 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 23.380412469 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.625 0.674092028746 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.94800884956 61% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 48.5555555556 51.4728631049 94% => OK
Elegance: 1.48913043478 1.64882698954 90% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331767555209 0.391690518653 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.104875603148 0.123202303941 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0570126510498 0.077325440228 74% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.514859426934 0.547984918172 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.130502128002 0.149214159877 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136510337184 0.161403998019 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545308471786 0.0892212321368 61% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.391113884418 0.385218514788 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0431024623689 0.0692045440612 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23875894784 0.275328986314 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546122169419 0.0653680567796 84% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30420353982 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 7.22455752212 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.