The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010.
The line chart indicates the amount of three different food consumed in China from 1985 to 2010. Overall, the consumption of fish and meat increased, while the consumption of salt fell. It is noted that China accounted for the highest consumption of fish.
To begin, in 1985, the amount of fish consumed stood at the highest amount, at 600 grammes. Figures for salt and meat were lower, at nearly 500 grammes and 100 grammes respectively. By 1995, the chart shows a different trend between the consumption of the three kinds of food. While the amount of salt consumed had fallen gradually to approximately 350 grammes, the figure for meat had risen steadily to just above 150 grammes. On the other hand, the consumption of fish had remained unchanged, despite a reach of 700 grammes in 1990.
During 15 years later, the amount of fish consumed had grown considerably to approx 850 grammes. It is clear that fish consumption remained the top amount over the period of 25 years. Similarly, meat consumption had increased slightly to 200 grammes. In contrast, there was a gradual decrease in the amount of salt consumed, at 200 grammes by 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | Kien Vu | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-26 | windingsilverfish | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-04 | ochirvaani | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | Vadim | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-28 | Vadim | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014. 90
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000 84
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. 84
- The chart below gives information about the UK s ageing population in 1985 and makes predictions for 2035 84
- The diagram below shows the production of electricity using a system called Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion OTEC 73
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'similarly', 'while', 'in contrast', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.248868778281 0.268076937826 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.131221719457 0.116061578633 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0497737556561 0.0759168565197 66% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0452488687783 0.0366838410393 123% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00904977375566 0.0131127313244 69% => OK
Prepositions: 0.16742081448 0.155750635184 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0497737556561 0.0379272487307 131% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.66543363998 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.027149321267 0.0210936926555 129% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0950226244344 0.0948980150116 100% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.00967000014798 0% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1145.0 1161.00487805 99% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.9 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87179487179 5.90752243213 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73763899035 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.323076923077 0.337110787985 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.241025641026 0.247514529752 97% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.184615384615 0.171178102325 108% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.107692307692 0.112407865282 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66543363998 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517948717949 0.546246751206 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 44.848733428 49.3433353143 91% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 8.93414634146 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.25 23.0094962315 71% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.0831604419 42.9750493124 47% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4166666667 135.714022679 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 23.0094962315 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.416666666667 0.689975730869 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.84146341463 78% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 40.3525641026 47.7609492067 84% => OK
Elegance: 2.51219512195 2.94281807926 85% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320394208945 0.418131533498 77% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.127688014779 0.181151798455 70% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0602684058169 0.0850326197045 71% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.579870589149 0.706616315825 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.109975396427 0.157042692854 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163908926903 0.228904883108 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930826359004 0.108899403657 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.565458508273 0.367819155151 154% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0110752047496 0.0812612215331 14% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265794428642 0.316326947829 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487898157623 0.0921553760075 53% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70731707317 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.08536585366 147% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.16585365854 158% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.02926829268 165% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 7.1512195122 154% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.