Some people believe it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle, given the evidence for global climate change. Others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are unwarranted, based on the existing evidence for global climate change.
Energy consumptions and global warming has always been interlinked from the past. Global warming results from the emission of greenhouse gases such as co2, so2, ch4 and others similar and more toxic gases. The source of such production has always been the mega cities with mega industries and people having high standards of life. So, the claim is justifiable in saying it is utmost for the people in more developed countries to reduce the energy consumption and lead a more of a balanced approach to life. Whereas the other half of people who believe changes in lifestyle is unwarranted are those who are stubborn enough not to give up the ease of life and use of the sources of such toxic products which is far more driven by hedonism and personal motives and cannot be justified.
As explained earlier, global warming has been the issue of century. It poses many threats to the individual even with the chances of extinction of human and other races due to extreme changes in the weather which are not cope-able in the future. The major cause of the global warming are those toxic and harmful gases such as mentioned earlier which arise from the use of different energy sources such as gases, petrol, coals and other such energy producers.
Let us take an example of china, some years ago a data was collected which showed more number of cars in china than human population. Deeming the fact the china is the most populated country in the world the number of automobiles is staggering. The smoke it produces and the toxic materials accumulated in the atmosphere is unimaginable. In this scenario, if the individuals give up on such luxury and start using public vehicles and cycles or some other safer measures, the problem is definitely going to reduce.
Along with china, many other superpowers of the world such as America, Japan, Russia, the condition is similar. In addition to the auto-mobiles they have mega factories and structures that continuously pollutes the atmosphere with their toxins. All the motives of such industries are the same: hedonism and materialism. As the evidences of global warming are already seen such as rise of temperature more than 2 degree Celsius in last 100 years, rise of sea level in coastal regions, many of the vertebrates going extinct, the hole in Antarctica ozone layer, the melting of the ice and polar caps. Such existence-threatening incidents cannot go unnoticed and it is imperative for individuals to think above themselves for once.
However, there are sayings that global warming is a natural phenomenon and humans have no role in it, it doesn't hold true. The activities of human has accelerated the causes of global warming and if not controlled is a real threat to human existence all together.
In a nutshell, the human behavior, more so the behavior of the people of developed countries who thrive on the causative agents of global warming i.e. energy sources that produces greenhouse gases. It is a compulsion that they must reduces their usage and live a more sustainable life and approach given the evidences of global warming. Also the people who think human action have no role in such natural occurrences should extend their horizon and lead a more balanced approach as all is not lost. And still we have the chance to continue our existence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-06 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | Jeet Thkaur | 66 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | bhavna288 | 50 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | ulligadda sreeja | 50 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | ulligadda sreeja | 50 | view |
- Some people argue that successful leaders in government, industry, or other fields must be highly competitive. Other people claim that in order to be successful, a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others. 58
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 50
- EVERY INDIVIDUAL IN A SOCIETY HAS A RESPONSIBILITY TO OBEY JUST LAWS AND TO DISOBEY AND RESIST UNJUST LAWS. 66
- "On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number ofaccidents involving mopeds and pedestrians, the town council of Balmer Island should limit the 50
- Government should provide education free of cost to the students who go to the colleges but can not afford the college 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...menon and humans have no role in it, it doesnt hold true. The activities of human has ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...esnt hold true. The activities of human has accelerated the causes of global warmin...
^^^
Line 9, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... human behavior, more so the behavior of the people of developed countries who th...
^^
Line 9, column 339, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... given the evidences of global warming. Also the people who think human action have ...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'whereas', 'in addition', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.261083743842 0.240241500013 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.128078817734 0.157235817809 81% => OK
Adjectives: 0.134646962233 0.0880659088768 153% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0492610837438 0.0497285424764 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0262725779967 0.0444667217837 59% => OK
Prepositions: 0.124794745484 0.12292977631 102% => OK
Participles: 0.0361247947455 0.0406280797675 89% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.69214382686 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0164203612479 0.030933414821 53% => OK
Particles: 0.00328407224959 0.0016655270985 197% => OK
Determiners: 0.110016420361 0.0997080785238 110% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00656814449918 0.0249443105267 26% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.0164203612479 0.0148568991511 111% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3321.0 2732.02544248 122% => OK
No of words: 561.0 452.878318584 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.91978609626 6.0361032391 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86676880123 4.58838876751 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.347593582888 0.366273622748 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.245989304813 0.280924506359 88% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.169340463458 0.200843997647 84% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.122994652406 0.132149295362 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69214382686 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 219.290929204 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479500891266 0.48968727796 98% => OK
Word variations: 57.616920765 55.4138127331 104% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6194690265 116% => OK
Sentence length: 23.375 23.380412469 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7470537969 59.4972553346 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.375 141.124799967 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 23.380412469 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.333333333333 0.674092028746 49% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 47.9739304813 51.4728631049 93% => OK
Elegance: 2.07258064516 1.64882698954 126% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339885222844 0.391690518653 87% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.108334987755 0.123202303941 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0621448568675 0.077325440228 80% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.561011470708 0.547984918172 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.157431139548 0.149214159877 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136752634563 0.161403998019 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653566610715 0.0892212321368 73% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.475273936428 0.385218514788 123% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0906319467654 0.0692045440612 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223458647182 0.275328986314 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523065724546 0.0653680567796 80% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.4325221239 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.