Some people think secondary school students should learn international news as one of their subjects, while others believe that this is a waste of valuable time. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Teaching world news to children can have different views. It can be useful since the world is becoming globalised, while it can be wasteful since the world is becoming homogeneous. In this essay will discuss about both aspects of views on world news before reaching a reasonable conclusion.
There are several different aspects of teaching international news to children. This can be seen as valuable subjects because the world is becoming globalised. As the society develops, the recognition of other country’s tradition and foreign country’s economic status becomes important. In order to grasp of that information, listening and learning about the international news are vital. By frequent observant of the global news, children may easily understand the situation occurring around the world and can identify the reasons for the current economic status. As a result, children may see the potential opportunities that face in the future consequences.
However, it can be considered as waste of time of learning other country’s situation while the world’s product and economic status become homogeneous. As the world becomes globalised, the products and the economic status become as a one. For example, in the 2008 subprime mortgage cases in the USA, the effect of this financial crisis affected the whole world due to globalisation and this had led to global financial crisis, known as GFC. As it can be seen from the example, as the world becomes the one huge monopoly market, the one’s economic status is no longer valid. Because knowing of one’s economic status will affect another country’s economy anyhow, so it is important to know about the current situation happening in local countries first.
In conclusion, knowing about global economy is as important as knowing the local countries. While I understand that the local country’s economic and political issues are important to know as a foundation, I also believe that this will affect other countries’ relevant status due to the globalisation. Due to this globalisation, it is easily seen that McDonald or other Western brands in the whole world as a monopoly and vice versa. From this example, we can conclude that the homogeneous products are the result of globalisation and thus one’s economic status affects the other like domino effect. Thus, it is important to know the local news as much as global ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-09 | Thao Anh194 | 84 | view |
| 2016-10-10 | Monica1 | 67 | view |
| 2016-10-09 | winstoncheng | 67 | view |
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extent do you agree or disagree 66
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 67
- The pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made 77
- Some people think that studying from the past offers no benefits to today’s life while others believe that history is a valuable source of information for us. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- The chart below gives information about global sales of games software, CDs and DVD or video. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 11, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...ing a reasonable conclusion. There are several different aspects of teaching international news ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.23311546841 0.247107183377 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.135076252723 0.155533422707 87% => OK
Adjectives: 0.126361655773 0.0946595960268 133% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0239651416122 0.0501214627716 48% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0217864923747 0.0437548338989 50% => OK
Prepositions: 0.122004357298 0.122226691241 100% => OK
Participles: 0.0479302832244 0.0403226058552 119% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.06223467205 2.80594681477 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0217864923747 0.0326793684256 67% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.106753812636 0.0861772015684 124% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0283224400871 0.021408717616 132% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00217864923747 0.011925033212 18% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2428.0 1933.35771543 126% => OK
No of words: 383.0 316.048096192 121% => OK
Chars per words: 6.33942558747 6.12580529183 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20517956788 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.409921671018 0.374742101984 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.323759791123 0.28420135186 114% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.245430809399 0.203846283523 120% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.146214099217 0.137316102897 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06223467205 2.80594681477 109% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.037074148 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.436031331593 0.56093040696 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 45.5326168922 60.7387585426 75% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0891783567 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.1578947368 20.7743622355 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1477213778 49.517814964 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.789473684 127.492653851 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1578947368 20.7743622355 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.578947368421 0.814263465372 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 52.5338738491 49.1944974215 107% => OK
Elegance: 2.22891566265 1.69124875643 132% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180738525472 0.332605444948 54% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.149863985822 0.102741220458 146% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0981393990083 0.0668466124924 147% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.557816772681 0.534860350844 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.112382678589 0.148594505496 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932308977429 0.134430193775 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379076577398 0.0742795772207 51% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.537193728945 0.324371583561 166% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.144988742311 0.0638462369009 227% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141259112787 0.228012699653 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00980422642656 0.058150111329 17% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.68436873747 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41683366733 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 5.90881763527 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 1.9629258517 153% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.4468937876 134% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.