Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Railways and roads have played important roles in enabling progress throughout human history. Even today, the effects of these infrastructures are very powerful, as they have direct influence on the quality of life. I believe focusing on railway construction makes the most sense.
Although i believe governments should build railways, there are also a great many benefits of roads. Firstly, in the case of railways, only subways or trains can use that roads. However, roads can be used by variety of vehicles: cars, trucks, motorcycles and bicycles. Secondly, building new roads often means that new amenities will be built nearby. Since governments should build new facilities like hospitals. libraries and courts on the places which are usually low price and empty for the reasonable consumption of budget and new roads enable it.
But I find there are more pros to have more railways. Nowadays we are getting losing our resources. I believe using trains and subways can be the answer to this problem by transferring a lot more people or supplies at once than cars. It uses less energy to transport materials and merchandise by rail. If alongside this, governments can reduce the volume of traffic in big cities by subways, problems like air pollution caused by car exhaust, fumes, traffic noise, accidents and so on that deteriorate the life satisfaction will be reduced.
Finally, to sum up, when building railways and loads, many things need to be taken into consideration first. But I insist that governments should have to consider environmental aspect the most since there are many possibilities that they have to spend astronomical amount of money on recovering the environment. So if I take all these factors into account, having railways can be more helpful for diverse aspects of society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Dungphung | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | BIBHU KALITA | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | tranhien297 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | pateldhruv1708 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | geforce | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010. 78
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yeman and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. 84
- Some people think that studying the past does not teach us anything about the life today, while others think that history gives us valuable information about life today. Discuss both views and state your opinion. 67
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030. 67
- Many governments in the world spend large amounts of money on art which helps to improve the quality of people s lives However governments should spend money on other things rather than art Do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 10, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ruction makes the most sense. Although i believe governments should build railwa...
^
Line 2, column 351, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hat new amenities will be built nearby. Since governments should build new facilities...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 413, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Libraries
...ld build new facilities like hospitals. libraries and courts on the places which are usua...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n cars. It uses less energy to transport materials and merchandise by rail. If al...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.270516717325 0.247107183377 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.155015197568 0.155533422707 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0729483282675 0.0946595960268 77% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0607902735562 0.0501214627716 121% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0334346504559 0.0437548338989 76% => OK
Prepositions: 0.127659574468 0.122226691241 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0455927051672 0.0403226058552 113% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.81467558169 2.80594681477 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0212765957447 0.0326793684256 65% => OK
Particles: 0.00303951367781 0.00163938923432 185% => OK
Determiners: 0.0577507598784 0.0861772015684 67% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0303951367781 0.021408717616 142% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00607902735562 0.011925033212 51% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1805.0 1933.35771543 93% => OK
No of words: 293.0 316.048096192 93% => OK
Chars per words: 6.16040955631 6.12580529183 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20517956788 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.389078498294 0.374742101984 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.279863481229 0.28420135186 98% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.211604095563 0.203846283523 104% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.133105802048 0.137316102897 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81467558169 2.80594681477 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.037074148 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621160409556 0.56093040696 111% => OK
Word variations: 70.5606373764 60.7387585426 116% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0891783567 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.2352941176 20.7743622355 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.951741417 49.517814964 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.176470588 127.492653851 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2352941176 20.7743622355 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.647058823529 0.814263465372 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.99599198397 100% => OK
Readability: 45.2216422405 49.1944974215 92% => OK
Elegance: 1.78048780488 1.69124875643 105% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175669918141 0.332605444948 53% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.071733688418 0.102741220458 70% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0410950998138 0.0668466124924 61% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.450229913031 0.534860350844 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.12490720292 0.148594505496 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634949828543 0.134430193775 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403803428049 0.0742795772207 54% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.252957845559 0.324371583561 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0139217550164 0.0638462369009 22% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114623017885 0.228012699653 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316106793418 0.058150111329 54% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.68436873747 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.41683366733 205% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 5.90881763527 68% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.5751503006 155% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 1.9629258517 306% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.4468937876 134% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.