Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
•Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade.
•Say nothing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
If I were in this situation, I would interrupt and correct the misunderestanding forthwith.
First, In this way If any body else had a misunderestanding the same as me could correct his thought. It is likely that a large group of people disagree with the mentioned point in the meeting. However, because they think they are alone they do not say any thing either. For example, I had a sale meeting with my boss and five other coworkers. During the meeting the boss declared that every salors must sale over 50 million Toman every month from now on. It was definitely impossible, so I interupt him and said my resaons why we can not promise to do this big sale. Fortunately he was convinced and after the the meeting my coworkers said that thank you, we never could afford that sales. This experience taoght me that, it is significant to convey my though right away.
Second, If I do not interrupt I am busy thinking about that matter until that class or meeting is over, so I can not listen to following discusion. For instance, I had a chemistry class two weeks ago. The teacher made a numerical mistake on board, which eventuate in a wrong result. The teacher was too strict, So I did not dare to tell him the error. During the class, I was struggling with my though to say or do not say. As a result, I could not learn anything about other topics, which were discussed in the class that day.
Third, other people in the calss or meeting can support or oppeses the misunderestanding and by discussing the point in a large group with diverse ideas, the point whil be clear.
In sum, based on arguments explored above, we can reach the conclusion that it is a good idea to correct any misunderestanding right away during a meeting or in the calss. In this way, you are open to listen to following discution. Morover
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meeting 60
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field. 54
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 50
- TPO43 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anybody'?
Suggestion: anybody
...ing forthwith. First, In this way If any body else had a misunderestanding the same a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
Suggestion: anything
...ey think they are alone they do not say any thing either. For example, I had a sale meeti...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... Fortunately he was convinced and after the the meeting my coworkers said that thank yo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... Fortunately he was convinced and after the the meeting my coworkers said that thank yo...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... The teacher made a numerical mistake on board, which eventuate in a wrong result...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, third, as to, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 330.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55151515152 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73167321755 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530303030303 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0536185413 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4444444444 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247301358249 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711280233672 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431060073771 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12409054556 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633630147658 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Try to use less pronouns (like 'It, I, They, We, You...') as the subject of a sentence.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.