Some people believe it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle, given the evidence for global climate change. Others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are unwarranted, based on the existing evidence for global climate change.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The issue states that some people believe that people living in developed nations should reduce their energy consumption and lead more sustainable lifestyle, given the evidence for global climate change whereas others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are not needed. I support that people should reduce their energy consumption.
There are a lot of changes in the environment because of human activities and energy consumption. We use petrol, gas and diesel in cars and motorcycles to fuel our vehicles. Even if people want to go nearby, they use cars. Instead if cycles are used, it would benefit a lot. People should start using cycles more which would lead to less consumption of fuel. The pollution caused by these emitted gases also cause harm to the environment. Instead people can use solar cars or cars that run on batteries. There are some cases where people cannot use solar cars for example for ambulances or police vehicles. But others can try to adopt these methods to reduce energy consumption.
People use a lot of electricity in their houses and workplaces. Even if there is only one person, all the lights are on. Some people also keep lights on during the day even if they are not needed. Instead they should let sunlight in and reduce the energy consumption. Although there are some places where we cannot limit the energy consumption. For example energy is needed to keep the servers for websites running 24 hours. This also can be done using renewable energy as far as possible and switch to electricity only when it is not available.
We should save electricity where ever possible and try to reverse the global climate change. People should try to limit their energy consumption and try to save Earth for destruction and save it for future generations. People can instead use solar energy and install solar panels and use that energy instead of electricity. Of course there are some areas where people need to use electricity such as hospitals where patients need support of machines to stay alive. But other areas where we can limit our use of energy we should definitely try to do so. If people continue using the energy resources as they do now, this could lead to global climate change and it would affect the lives of humans as well as other living beings on Earth.
People should try to limit their use of energy where ever possible and try to use renewable energy. This would help limit the global climate change which would otherwise cause destruction of Earth in the long run.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-06 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | Jeet Thkaur | 66 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | bhavna288 | 50 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | ulligadda sreeja | 50 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | ulligadda sreeja | 50 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 54
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 60
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 85
- Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street while others think that it is the right thing to do Which point of view do you think is correct and why 43
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating, and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes litt 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...eople want to go nearby, they use cars. Instead if cycles are used, it would benefit a ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 440, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...ses also cause harm to the environment. Instead people can use solar cars or cars that ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...ng the day even if they are not needed. Instead they should let sunlight in and reduce ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t in and reduce the energy consumption. Although there are some places where we cannot l...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, whereas, for example, of course, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2103.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87935034803 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4269518614 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.406032482599 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 683.1 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7294238489 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.8846153846 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5769230769 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.96153846154 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353831072326 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10014092628 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143330228668 0.0758088955206 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256432990464 0.150359130593 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.222007473864 0.0667264976115 333% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.