Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas.
Poor countries like Uganda and Nigeria need a radical change to improve the economic growth and development of the nation mainly in Healthcare, Education and International trade. However, the issue is not entirely straightforward, although some arguments can also be made against the idea. In this essay, the debate will be discussed and will be given a concluding view.
On the one hand, proponents who support the idea of rich nations helping deprived nations cite various benefits, it can bring to an economy. Firstly, if the government were to enter the bilateral trade agreement with any of the developed nations, it would help in creating the job opportunities, opening up new avenues for education and can facilitate the high technological healthcare facility in the economy. Thus, the higher the income the better the spending power of consumer would be. Secondly, it helps in improving the standard of life of individuals and society, which turns out to be a very beneficial factor to the GDP (Gross Domestic Product) of the economy, While, it can allow poor nation to give some subsidy on the high-end expensive medicines.
Conversely, opponents point out their view that entering International agreement with any advanced country or maybe seeking aid in any form of assistance can bring catastrophic effects on the economy. Firstly, Developed countries can exploit the local resources of the host country while putting their own resources to take care of the facility. For instance, Although Afghanistan entered the peace treaty with united states but U.S Government still deploys their troops in the host country and its adjoining nations. Secondly based on the above actions, it can make the developed country more powerful, robust and resources available to use at any point of time to them.
Overall, it seems that poverty-stricken nations should do some groundwork research to find out what benefits and what negative events it can bring to the economy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | vahid57 | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | Rav Mander | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-04 | bhatvishal@ | 67 | view |
| 2019-03-24 | azhar46 | 78 | view |
| 2018-04-05 | unicor01 | 61 | view |
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care. Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family? 73
- Healthcare should always be funded by governments, and it should be always be free for people to use.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this idea? 56
- It is more important to invest in further education rather than to gain work experience after finishing university in order to find a good job Do you agree or disagree 78
- you are planning to stay in a hotel in an English speaking country. You are writing to the hotel manager to find out some additional information. In your letter ask the following questions: • What the daily rate 73
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...e peace treaty with united states but U.S Government still deploys their troops i...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23659305994 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86305714221 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605678233438 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.7751719124 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.333333333 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4166666667 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188894174901 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649124202952 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548992503895 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105357408317 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462009564305 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.