Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
The deterioration of air pollution is an alarming issue globally. While some people are of the opinion that a day when cars are prohibited is a workable measure to alleviate this contamination, I think larger – scale and long-term measures need to be taken to combat this problem.
On the one hand, there is a common belief that a car-free day can reduce air-pollution severity. Firstly, carbon dioxide emission from exhausted fumes may be significantly cut off, for cars are not allowed to be used on that day. This expectation stems from the success of Earth hour program that has been conducted for many years and made enormous contributions to the reduction of electricity consumption. Secondly, if people do not commute by car on that day, they have to resort to other means of transport such as walking, bus or subway, and therefore, the rewarding experiences help them be aware of the convenience and mobility of other commuting methods in comparison with cars. After that, these environmentally – friendly transportation can become their preferred choice.
On the other hand, I think this answer is not feasible and sustainable enough to address severe air contamination. Only applying car-free rules for one day decreases the greenhouse gas emissions very minimally. Instead, government should impose higher luxury taxes on cars like it has been implementing in many developing countries. Only after this policy is applied can fewer people afford cars, and consequently car density on roads fall with the decline of its emissions. Furthermore, other developed nations should invest in energy-efficient engines so that commuters can still benefit from the safety and comfort of cars and the quantity of pollutants in the atmosphere is controlled. For example, electric cars can be a feasible alternative for petroleum ones for eco-friendly purposes.
In conclusion, the program that encourage motorists to give up their cars for one day is a good idea to deal with air pollution, but government need to simultaneously take other measures such as car price increase and advancements of car engines.
- Some people believe law changes human behaviour. Do you agree/disagree? 77
- The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn. Do you Agree or Disagree? 77
- It is believed that there are as many as 1800 rare plants and animals on Earth. Should we protect the endanged species? Agree disagree? 80
- Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are some other ways. Discusss both views and give you own opinion 67
- Some people think that government should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity. Discuss both views and give your opinion 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1776.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2389380531 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10261105948 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607669616519 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0790320607 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.857142857 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9285714286 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238261954377 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782227336648 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584191953005 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153081102311 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210055796707 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.