Throwing things
Utilising things in different ways with making it negative effect has been played an inevitable part in human life around the world. It seems many human kinds are throwing away their broken things instead of making it useful, indeed they are replacing them modern type, while older generation used their equipments for a long time. It can be agreed that encourage people to use their things rightly with repairing is one of the possible way. This essay will ellaborate this problem, give causes of this and suggest a potential solutions to this matter.
Our social life is being developed with creating everything in short times. So, there are huge amount of products in markets for the users, whose want to use this kind of product`s modern one. Therefore, many people are trying buy or changing their things faster. So, this situation were made them incredible persons. Moreover, making social status higher in comparison to others can be one of the reason. Because, almost every one are afraid of their relatives and friends, whey they use old one.
Losing high proportion of fund to buy new one can be sub-problem which is happened after this situation. For that reason, changing things frequently are not easy for everyone. After this they will have diffuculties.
Summing up, it is axiomatic from above confabulations that everything comes with its drawbacks as well as advantages, but we should always choose between anything by considering its greater good on both personal and social life. I still stand on my point of view that human should choose only suitable thing for them as a older generations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-21 | Trang Duong | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-07 | dinhthu05 | 61 | view |
| 2020-11-15 | lhm.ils | 89 | view |
| 2020-08-23 | hanhkatori2402 | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | ralfs | 84 | view |
- Nowadays children are consuming too many sugar-based drinks.What are solutions to this situation? 90
- About Nuclear powerOpinion essay 78
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year 2009. 78
- Throwing things 61
- Advances in science and technology and other areas of society in the last 100 years have transformed the way we live as well as postponing the day we die There is no better time to be alive than now To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinio 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 528, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'solution'?
Suggestion: solution
... causes of this and suggest a potential solutions to this matter. Our social life is b...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...hing in short times. So, there are huge amount of products in markets for the users, w...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s frequently are not easy for everyone. After this they will have diffuculties. Su...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 321, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... choose only suitable thing for them as a older generations.
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, while, in short, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04089219331 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5716471531 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639405204461 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.8096529615 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163718841752 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524934145545 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670058547855 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930355373756 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625783915497 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.