increase petrol tax in order to decrease traffic and pollution. Do you agree?
In the wake of social development, green issues have become more serious than ever. As a consequence, whether should the government raise the tax on petrol to solve these problems is a highly debate. My view is that the gas cost should definitely be elevated.
It is irrefutable that an enormous number of vehicles on the road is the main reason which cause traffic congestion as well as pollution. In these regards, a huge amount of emission and toxic gas that comes from these automobiles could worsen environmental situations. Therefore, if the government increases the affordable price of petrol, there would be less frequently used means of transport and solving the problems as well.
Furthermore, in many countries, the taxes on personal car owners have decrease, which leads to the bombing of vehicles in inner cities. To illustrate, in 2015 in Vietnam, the cars taxes have gone down to 0% and the traffic jams have happened more regularly since then. Thus, the idea that the authorities lifting gas taxes should be launched as soon as possible.
Despite it is advantageous, there are detrimental effects too. For people whose works depend mostly on cars like taxi drivers, it of course, might be their worst nightmare. Nevertheless, they could improve the prices to work it out.
In conclusion, it can be said that by lifting the gasoline prices, traffic and smog would be vanished. By doing so, we can make sure that these issues would be releaved.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-07 | kelvin sandi | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-09 | Mollymaul | 80 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-20 | Arun rathour | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-17 | Aarti sharma | 84 | view |
- 1.Some people say that the government should not put money on building theatres and sports stadiums. Other argues that they should spend more money on medical care and education. Discuss both view 89
- what is the advantage of improve living standard? 84
- how technology affect our life? 61
- aaaaaaa 11
- Should higher fuel price? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('highly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('debate') instead of another adjective.
...ax on petrol to solve these problems is a highly debate. My view is that the gas cost should de...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, of course, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1220.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 245.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97959183673 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75687018093 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624489795918 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1702264429 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1428571429 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134658577495 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395026812411 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382407540529 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0635702458475 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365423537977 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.