People have different job expectations for jobs. Some people prefer to do the same job for the same company, whereas others prefer to change jobs frequently. Write about the advantages and disadvantages of each viewpoint.
Over the last few decades our lifestyle has dramatically changed; these changes have also altered the way people used to work. The new term, job-hopping, appeared in labor markets, which describes a person who works briefly in one position after another rather than staying at a job for a long time. Some experts favor job hopping over lingering in a position for a long time since it is, according to experts, more beneficial, is it so?
Conducting the same job for the same company can be beneficial in terms of stability and friends. Most employees prefer a steady job, though with relatively low salary, to looking for a better one with higher income, especially in times of “ups and downs” in economies of the world. It can be hard to make friends who would back up in emergency situations at workplace. My uncle, for instance, could not have delivered a presentation for his new project to the CEO of the company, had not he borrowed a shirt of his work friend when he had spilled coffee on his own one. Nevertheless, individuals who are in the same position for 10-20 years have a risk to miss opportunities for better appointments in other companies; therefore, they also miss having a higher salary.
There is Steve Jobs’s famous citation: “Do what you love, love what you do”. It seems in order to ascertain one’s passion, one has to try several jobs until he finds it. My personal experience can be a good example. I love managing finance, so luckily I work as a financial manager for Apple company; however, I hopped several jobs working as an accountant assistant, as my major is accountant, in several companies after graduation. On the other hand, employers are reluctant to hire job hoppers due to less credibility. Market economy prevails in most countries as a result companies have own commercial secrets. Therefore, entities favor employees who tend to work for long-term over job hoppers.
Labor markets have changed resulting in two common types of employees: job hoppers and ones who prefer working for a long time. It appears both types have advantages and drawbacks, thus, it is up to companies and employees to opt which type they want.
- Wild animals have no use in the 21st century and trying to preserve animals now is just wastage of money. 73
- We are increasingly becoming dependent on computers. They are used in business, hospitals, crime detection and even to fly planes. What things will they be used in the future? Is this dependence on computers a good thing or should we be more suspicious of 89
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 67
- Labour Arbitration Case between Canada Post Corporation and Canadian Union of Post Workers 67
- Companies should encourage employees who work in a high position to leave at the age of 55 in order to give opportunities to the new generation. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, as to, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1826.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90860215054 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81186907596 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591397849462 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2678576692 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.411764706 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8823529412 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31277816137 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976429370689 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623699294895 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190408696856 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262650148708 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.