Long distance flight uses more fuel than cars and brings pollution to the environment. We should discourage non-essential flight rather than limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent decades, global warming has been attracting a great deal of public attention due to its substantial impacts on humankind. Although the proposal of limiting unnecessary flights appears reasonable, car restriction is more practical and effective.
On the one hand, There are many problems associated when it comes to discouraging non-essential flights. First, traveling by planes is one of the most convenient and fastest ways to travel from one location to another. Restricting flights means that citizens have to use other alternative vehicles such as cars or trains which require remarkable physical travels, costing unnecessary time, money and effort. Second, air travel restriction is conducive to a reduction in foreign tourism. This suggests a causal relationship with a decrease in national incomes of many countries especially those depends heavily on tourism as the main source of national revenues.
On the other hand, it is true that limitation of cars could bestow net positive environmental benefits. First, an upward pattern could be witnessed in car numbers while plane numbers remain stable in many countries especially the developing ones. It is implied that reducing car usage would diminish more carbon dioxide and monoxide concentrations than reducing flights, contributing considerably to the environmental rehabilitation. Beside, Citizens can switch to public vehicles such as underground trains or buses for environmental efficiency. This is because public transportation is invariably associated with a lower degree of fossil fuel consumption, which is proved to be the main source of exhausted fumes in the atmosphere.
In conclusion, limiting unnecessary flights could culminate in some negative consequences related to foreign tourism and travel comfort. Restriction of cars could act as a deterrent for the deterioration of the environment due to its dominance in numbers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-31 | nbui2 | 84 | view |
| 2018-07-21 | IVANTRUONG | 89 | view |
| 2018-07-18 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
| 2018-07-18 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
| 2018-07-18 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
- Rich countries should not employ skilled labour from poor countries as poor countries need the workers more Do you agree or disagree 89
- Long distance flight uses more fuel than cars and brings pollution to the environment We should discourage non essential flight rather than limit the use of cars To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 62
- Some people think that it is important to have a single language as an international official language. Others think that it will make it difficult to identify countries and cause a loss of culture. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 73
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor of t 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, while, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70979020979 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21895829474 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604895104895 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1240982538 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.642857143 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157216761022 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494690791022 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473833090742 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0873504574608 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0134152812066 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.