how has communication changed over the years
Undoubtedly, no one can abnegate that communication is essential part of life. Communication gives a shape to our society and boost our relationships. The use of technology in communication also help to people to communicate other people with easy and fast methods and reduce the time it takes. Electronic communication like text messages, email and social networking websites has enabled society to become more connected. However, one section of the society believe that today communication plays a pivotal role to build up a relationship and gives happiness to our life but other opposes this notation.
To initiate, there are multiple reasons that emails, social media, smartphones, text messages all have made the world a smaller place. The first and foremost reason is that long distance communication has become easier, faster and effortless in these days. Internet also totally change the shape of the communication. For example, video conferencing is a major benefit of internet communication. People can easily see or talk with their other relatives which are far from them. The most popular way people discuss things, with another individual, through mobiles phones. The smart phones has all kinds of new things that we can use to socialize with our peers. We no longer need to visit a relative or friend to get updates. Security feature also have a great advantage of today’s communication.
Diving deeper into the topic, some people believe that a lot of lower and middle level jobs have been done away with causing more people to become unemployed. Some experts believe that internet has made job security a big issue as communication keeps on changing with each day. One has to be in a constant learning mode if he or she wishes for their jobs to be secure. Information passed through communication medium is soft target for hackers and should require layer protection.
In crux, mode of communication help people to keep close each other and able to talk in easy way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-08-15 | GAGAN mehra | 77 | view |
- The role of human cloning has accelerated rapidly To what extent you think will it replace the material things 51
- The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write , but those who cannot learn, unlearn and relearn. Agree or disagree. 75
- Positive and negative effects of today s communication 72
- Climate change and about the role of government corporate and individuals can play to improve it 85
- Marketing strategy for big companies should be placed on offer and discounts and in what ways this can impact on their reputation. 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 606, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r life but other opposes this notation. To initiate, there are multiple reasons ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 589, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...hrough mobiles phones. The smart phones has all kinds of new things that we can use...
^^^
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...perts believe that internet has made job security a big issue as communication ke...
^^
Line 4, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ach other and able to talk in easy way.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 326.0 242.827586207 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11349693252 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9109589029 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 139.433497537 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585889570552 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 379.143842365 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 12.6551724138 150% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8062388499 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7368421053 104.977214359 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1578947368 20.9669160288 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.78947368421 7.25397266985 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 6.9802955665 201% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13567554225 0.242375264174 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437288646456 0.0925447433944 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450387044217 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845299417067 0.151781067708 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358080199175 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.