Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
Todays most companies takes penalties due to the corruptions ongoing in these companies, followingly, many companies have focused on this issue in their agendas immediately and started to make elaborated plans and controls in order to eliminate viable threats and possible lawsuits should consider the repercussions of such actions. However, owing to the various laws of the amendment, one of the most immutable rights of privacy is directly violated by the routine check-up of the electronic mail. In my opinion, companies should execute such an application only in case of observing suspicious occasions since such an application have negative drawbacks exceeding positive ones including violation of privacy, extra work burden and possible loss in efficacy.
First and foremost, in today's era of digitization almost all types of messages or content is shared through the e-mail or other sources which are accessed by the latter. Keeping this into mind it becomes an important asset for the employee which they do not wish to share unless the same has been signed upon at their induction. A serial threat to their privacy and malpractice of personal data can be observed with the same.
Secondly, the routine monitoring would create the need of an extra staff who would have to carry out this task as per the requirements, since the monitoring is on daily basis none of the regular employees can adhere to this need, as it would reduce the productivity of the task they were initially appointed to do. This vacancy would then reflect negatively on the financial end of the firm.
And while the proposed idea promises to reduce the waste of time, the individual time that is lost by each employee while their mails are checked renders them ineffective during that short period of time, hence upon the cumulative addition of such short gaps, the firm rather experiences a lack of work for large amounts of time on daily basis. This will also reflect badly on their system capacity.
On the other hand, there is a prospect that these controls may reveal some hidden information about corruptions, thus, it is vital to take precautions and take neccessary actions in order to prevent company reputation. For instance, in 2008, many investment firms including J&P Morgan which have started to this routine checks found out that there are lots of insiders within entity. This example illustrates that in case of being suspicious about possible dishonesties, it is well-advised to apply these checks.
The main purpose of the proposed issue was the reduce/eliminate lawsuits which harm the integrity of the firm, which majorly amounts from the leak of confidential information or internal espionage. hence to ensure this protection the company can introduce a policy of using only the company mail and to prohibit the usage of external devices or mailers, while in the company premises. This policy can be mentioned during the induction of the employees and a confidentiality bond can also be signed at the same time. The company mail can be equipped with a software which would check for possible leaks or threats hence resulting only in a onetime investment and not harming the aesthetic or financial resources of the firm.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | himanshu mardikar | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | Chayank_11 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | chapagain08 | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | Walia Farzana | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | anusingh | 75 | view |
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits. 83
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority. 83
- A true university encompasses far more than the narrow specialized study of a single discipline. Only through exploring the broad spectrum of liberal arts courses can the students become truly learned. 70
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military. 83
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ders them ineffective during that short period of time, hence upon the cumulative addition of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hich have started to this routine checks found out that there are lots of insider...
^^
Line 11, column 44, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... main purpose of the proposed issue was the reduce/eliminate lawsuits which harm the integ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 199, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
...tial information or internal espionage. hence to ensure this protection the company c...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 199, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: hence,
...tial information or internal espionage. hence to ensure this protection the company c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, while, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2707.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 529.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11720226843 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79583152331 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7514098144 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 279.0 215.323595506 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52741020794 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 862.2 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.558021958 60.3974514979 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.235294118 118.986275619 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1176470588 23.4991977007 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 5.21951772744 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244354719416 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650891449325 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498514665048 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107827381062 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549651588834 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 14.1392134831 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 48.8420337079 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 100.480337079 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.7820224719 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.