Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade
-Say nothing
Almost everyone has experinced being in a situation that has to choose the best way. One of this situation come across when a person attends in a meeting or class and during the speach of lecterur he or she undersatnd something wrong in speach content. In this regard, some people can not wait and interrupt the and correct the mistake, while others wait until the finishing of class or meeting to talk with lecterur or sometimes they prefer to say nothing. I am of the opinion that we have not to interupt the meeting or class and it is better to correct the mistake after finishing of seminar or class. I will attempt to address the most discernible reasnos below.
First, somtetimes the mistake that teachers of meeting leaders do is not realy mistake and it is only our misunderstaning. Most of the time when we come across with a mistake in a class or meeting, it is because of our lack of knowldege and so we have to wait to be sure about our idea regarding the mistake. My own experience is a compelling example of this. I remember that during my univeristy study I was in similar situation. But in the first time that I recognized a mistake in the speach of professor, I just interupted the talking of him and started to explain his mistake. Unfortunately I was wrong and the professor casted doubt my idea. he laughed at me and it was the last time that I interupted the class to correct a mistake. This example clearly shows that we have to be patient to correct someone's mistake.
As the second reasn I want to point out something which widely accepted. People can not tolerate revealing of their mistake in front of people.
I witnessed one of my closest friend in college which was editor of a university magazine. One day during a meeting regarding publishing of last volume of the magazine, one of the students started to say the mistakes that occured in the previous volume of the magazine. Even though all the mistakes that student mentioned were right, my firend as the editor didn't accept them. Becasue he thought that accepting of mistakes in front of other students will make problem for him. So before correction of someone's mistake we have to think about the atmosphere that we are.
In conclusion, it is for all aforementioned reasons, I come to believe that people have to wait the class or meeting is over and then correct the mistake of teacher or meeting leader. In this approach, we will be sure that the teacher will not suffered and also if we are wrong we sill not be ashame.
- People behave differently when they wear different clothes. Do you agree that different clothes influence the way people behave? 61
- 4-Day Workweek 68
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Birds and glass 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...person attends in a meeting or class and during the speach of lecterur he or she ...
^^
Line 3, column 649, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...and the professor casted doubt my idea. he laughed at me and it was the last time ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...patient to correct someones mistake. As the second reasn I want to point out so...
^^
Line 6, column 359, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ned were right, my firend as the editor didnt accept them. Becasue he thought that ac...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 478, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So before” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...her students will make problem for him. So before correction of someones mistake we have ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 245, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'suffer'
Suggestion: suffer
... will be sure that the teacher will not suffered and also if we are wrong we sill not be...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, second, so, then, while, as to, in conclusion, talking of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2068.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 452.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57522123894 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60966684284 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.442477876106 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 664.2 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7575581979 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265452677471 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726330059087 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776492267146 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147805557629 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061489997092 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.